Kylie Herd v. Airbus SAS et al

Filing 38

ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND ROLLS-ROYCE PLC by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. NOW THEREFORE, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that final judgment is entered in favor of Airbus S.A.S. and Rolls-Royce PLC and against Plaintiff on all claims asserted in this action. (mrgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KYLIE HERD, an individual,
Plaintiff,

12
vs.

13
14
15
16
17

AIRBUS S.A.S., a foreign corporation
doing business in the State of
California; AIRBUS GROUP HQ
INC., a corporation doing business in
the State of California; ROLLSROYCE plc, a foreign corporation
doing business in the State of
California,

18

Case No. 2:17-cv-05001
ORDER ENTERING FINAL
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND
ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

Defendant.

19
WHEREAS, on July 7, 2017, Plaintiff Kylie Herd (“Plaintiff”) filed this

20
21

action before this Court;
WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Airbus Group

22
23

HQ Inc. from this action;

24

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, Defendant Airbus S.A.S. moved to

25

dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for Damages based on the forum non conveniens

26

doctrine and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

27

12(b)(6);

28

///
[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND
ROLLS-ROYCE PLC

1

WHEREAS, on November 20, 2017, Defendant Rolls-Royce PLC joined in

2

the section of Airbus S.A.S.’s motion to dismiss that was based on the forum non

3

conveniens doctrine;

4

WHEREAS, on December 11, 2017, this Court granted Airbus S.A.S.’s and

5

Rolls-Royce PLC’s motion to dismiss based on the forum non conveniens doctrine.

6

NOW THEREFORE, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that final judgment

7

is entered in favor of Airbus S.A.S. and Rolls-Royce PLC and against Plaintiff on

8

all claims asserted in this action.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
12

Dated: December 27, 2017.

13

Hon. Stephen V. Wilson

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AIRBUS S.A.S. AND
ROLLS-ROYCE PLC