Yajaira Lopez v. ABM Onsite Services-West, Inc et al

Filing 15

ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 14 , it is hereby ORDERED that the action be hereby voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1100 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 (949) 851-1100 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 10 YAJAIRA LOPEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. ABM ONSITE SERVICES-WEST, 15 INC., a Delaware corporation; ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, a 16 Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Case No. 2:17-cv-05079-AB-SK [PROPOSED] ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) [Joint Stipulation Requesting Dismissal Filed And Submitted Under Separate Cover Concurrently Herewith] Action Filed: June 14, 2017 Courtroom: 7B 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to concurrently submitted Stipulation by and between all the parties through their counsel of record, and FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, it is hereby ORDERED that: 28 ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 1. 2 That the above-captioned action be hereby voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, in its entirety, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 3 4 2. Each party shall bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs. 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 11 DATED: October 03, 2017 12 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1100 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92614 (949) 851-1100 PAYNE & FEARS LLP 10 __________________________________ The Honorable André Birotte Jr. United States District Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?