Bernadette G. Nercessian v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 22

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment ("Stipulation") lodged concurrent with t he lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. 21 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ch)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NICOLA T. HANNA United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, General Civil Section STACY WIESBROCK, CSBN 257920 Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 160 Spear St., Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 268-5612 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: stacy.wiesbrock@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION BERNADETTE G. NERCESSIAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 22 ) No. 2:17-cv-05173-PLA ) ) JUDGMENT OF REMAND ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court having approved the parties’ Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation ”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation to Remand. DATED: February 13, 2018 HON. PAUL L. ABRAMS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?