Jose Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al

Filing 97

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge John A. Kronstadt; see Notice of Settlement 96 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (cw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES − GENERAL Case No. Title Present 2:17−cv−05219−JAK−RAO Date 2/13/2020 JOSE RODRIGUEZ V. WAL−MART STORES INC ET AL The Honorable JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Cheryl Wynn Deputy Clerk Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Proceedings: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE (JS-6) In light of the parties’ Notice of Settlement, the Court orders that this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Court retains jurisdiction to vacate this Order and to reopen the action within 60 days from the date of this Order, provided, however, any request by any party(ies) that the Court do so, shall make a showing of good cause as to why the settlement has not been completed within the 60-day period, what further settlement processes are necessary, and when the party(ies) making such a request reasonably expect the process to be concluded. This Order does not preclude the filing of a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, which does not require the approval of the Court. Such stipulation shall be filed within the aforementioned 60-day period, or by such later date ordered by the Court pursuant to a stipulation by the parties that conforms the requirements of a showing of good cause stated above. :00 Initials of Preparer: cw CV−90 − CIVIL MINUTES−GENERAL − Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?