Aramus Holdings LLC v. Shawntae Allen et al
Filing
8
ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 6230 Sylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, California 91401, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC section 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the State court; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
FILED
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
1 '
JULY 25 2017
2
3
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
vdr
BY: ___________________ DEPUTY
5
JS-6
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAI, DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARAMUS HOLDINGS LLC,
Case No. CV 17-5287 FMO (SSx)
11
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER SU~II~ARILY REI~NDING
v.
13
IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION
SHAWNTAE ALLEN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state
17
court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly.
18
19
On July 18, 2017, Defendants Shawntae Allen and Corey Allen,
20
having
been
sued
in
a
routine
unlawful
detainer
action
in
21
California state court, filed a Notice Of Removal of that action
22
to this Court and also presented separate applications to proceed
23
in forma pauperis.
The Court has denied the latter applications
24
under separate cover because the action was not properly removed.
25
To prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the
26
Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court.
27
28
1
Simply stated, this action could
not have
been
originally
filed in federal court because the complaint does not competently
3
allege
4
jurisdiction.
5
~ 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Svcs., Inc., 545
6
U.S. 546, 563 (2005).
facts
supporting
either
Therefore,
diversity
removal
is
or
federal-question
improper.
28
U.S.C.
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED
9
to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 6230
10
S ylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, California
11
matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ~ 1447(c); (2) the Clerk
12
send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the
13
Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
91401, for lack of subject
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
~~~ DATED: July 25, 2017
18
19
/s/
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 I
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?