Aramus Holdings LLC v. Shawntae Allen et al

Filing 8

ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 6230 Sylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, California 91401, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC section 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the State court; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
FILED CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 1 ' JULY 25 2017 2 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 vdr BY: ___________________ DEPUTY 5 JS-6 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAI, DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ARAMUS HOLDINGS LLC, Case No. CV 17-5287 FMO (SSx) 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER SU~II~ARILY REI~NDING v. 13 IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION SHAWNTAE ALLEN, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state 17 court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly. 18 19 On July 18, 2017, Defendants Shawntae Allen and Corey Allen, 20 having been sued in a routine unlawful detainer action in 21 California state court, filed a Notice Of Removal of that action 22 to this Court and also presented separate applications to proceed 23 in forma pauperis. The Court has denied the latter applications 24 under separate cover because the action was not properly removed. 25 To prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the 26 Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court. 27 28 1 Simply stated, this action could not have been originally filed in federal court because the complaint does not competently 3 allege 4 jurisdiction. 5 ~ 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Svcs., Inc., 545 6 U.S. 546, 563 (2005). facts supporting either Therefore, diversity removal is or federal-question improper. 28 U.S.C. 7 8 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED 9 to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 6230 10 S ylmar Avenue, Van Nuys, California 11 matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ~ 1447(c); (2) the Clerk 12 send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the 13 Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. 91401, for lack of subject 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 ~~~ DATED: July 25, 2017 18 19 /s/ FERNANDO M. OLGUIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?