Burk N. Ashford v. Scott Kernan
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/18/2017 ORDERING CASE TRANSFERRED to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.(Henshaw, R) [Transferred from California Eastern on 7/21/2017.]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
BURK N. ASHFORD,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:17-cv-1470 CKD P
v.
ORDER
SCOTT KERNAN,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. This
19
court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis.
Petitioner is incarcerated in California Men’s Colony and is challenging a disciplinary
20
21
conviction for while an inmate at California Men’s Colony for refusing to participate in
22
programming. California Men’s Colony is in an area embraced by the United States District
23
Court for the Central District of California.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of
24
25
confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state
26
prisoners. Because petitioner was not convicted in this district, and is not presently confined
27
here, this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application.
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. This court has not ruled on petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis; and
3
2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of
4
California. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).
5
Dated: July 18, 2017
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
12/ashf1470.108b
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?