Mission Valley Shoppingtown LLC v. Hye Eun Lee et al
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER TO REMAND STATE COURT COMMENCIAL UNLAWFUL DETAINED ACTION (DKT. 5) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The present Application to remand is GRANTED and the Court confirms the prior remand order and this action is remanded to the Superior Court for the County of San Diego (Case No. 37-2017-00017673 (CU-UD-CTL).MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (bp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
LA CV17-05418 JAK (FFMx)
Mission Valley Shoppingtown LLC v. Hye Eun Lee, et al.
Present: The Honorable
July 27, 2017
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR
ORDER TO REMAND STATE COURT COMMERCIAL UNLAWFUL
DETAINER ACTION (DKT. 5)
Based on the matters set forth in the Ex Parte Application for Order to Remand State Court Unlawful
Detainer Action, Declaration of George Blackmar, and supporting documents, the notice of removal in
this action is barred by the prior order (“Prior Order”) remanding the same action to San Diego Superior
Court entered on July 19, 2017 in Case No. LA17-05250 JAK (FFMx) (Dkt. 9). Thus, the present notice of
removal contravenes the Prior Order. For the reasons already stated, there is no federal jurisdiction over
this matter. Accordingly, the present Application to remand is GRANTED and the Court confirms the prior
remand order and this action is remanded to the Superior Court for the County of San Diego (Case No.
Given that the present removal was inconsistent with the Prior Order, Plaintiff may apply for an award of
sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11; Westlake N. Prop. Owners Ass'n v. City of Thousand Oaks, 915 F.2d
1301, 1303 (9th Cir. 1990).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?