Paul Eddie Bland II v. Carolyn Kuhl
Filing
7
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer, re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights), 1 . See Order for details. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dml)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PAUL EDDIE BLAND II,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
v.
Case No. CV 17-5442 DSF(JC)
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CAROLYN KUHL, et al.,
15
16
Defendants.
On July 24, 2017, plaintiff, who was then in custody and is proceeding pro
17 se, filed a Complaint and an Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees
18 (“IFP Application”). On August 3, 2017, the Court issued an order (“August
19 Order”) denying the IFP Application for the reasons explained therein, directing
20 plaintiff to pay the filing fees in full within 30 days, and advising plaintiff that if he
21 did not pay the filing fees within the foregoing time frame, the case would be
22 dismissed. The August Order was sent to plaintiff at his address of record but was
23 returned undelivered on August 11, 2017 with an indication that he had been
24 discharged. Although more than fifteen days have passed since the August Order
25 sent to plaintiff was returned undelivered, plaintiff has not notified the Court of his
26 current address, contrary to Local Rule 41-6.
27 ///
28 ///
1
As plaintiff is not entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees/in forma
2 pauperis, has not paid the filing fee by the aforementioned deadline, and has failed
3 to keep the Court informed of his current address in violation of Local Rule 41-6,
4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED.
5
9/20/17
6 DATED: ______________
7
8
_______________________________________
9
HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?