Mark Prado v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., et al

Filing 58

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff MARK PRADO and Defendant WAL-MART, INC., by and through their counsel of record, hereby request and stipulate to dismissal of the Action, with prejudice, as to all parties and claims 57 . Each party shall bear his/her/its own attorneys' fees and costs. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MARK PRADO, individually, and on behalf Case No.: 2:17-cv-05630-AB-KKx
of other members of the general public
similarly situated,
PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10,
Defendants.

[Removal from the Superior Court of
the State of California, County of Los
Angeles, Case No. BC666295]
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
LEGAL02/38718808v1

1

Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff MARK

2

PRADO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant WAL-MART, INC. (“Defendant”), by and

3

through their counsel of record, hereby request and stipulate to dismissal of the above-

4

entitled Action, with prejudice, as to all parties and claims. Each party shall bear

5

his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED

8
9
10
11

DATED: January 23, 2019

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
LEGAL02/38718808v1