Wongab Corporation v. Arcadia Group, Ltd. et al

Filing 22

ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 21 ; This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys' fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in this matter. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 WONGAB CORPORATION, a Korean Case No.: 2:17-cv-05967-CAS-SS Corporation, Hon. Christina A. Snyder Presiding 12 Plaintiff, 13 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. 14 17 ARCADIA GROUP, LTD., a Delaware Corporation, individually, and doing business as “TOP SHOP”; and DOES 1-10, 18 Defendants. 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER: FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE FOLLOWING IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This action is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); 2. This dismissal is subject to and predicated upon the settlement agreement that gave rise to this dismissal; 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION 1 2 3 4 5 3. The parties will each bear their respective costs and attorneys’ fees as incurred against one another in connection with this action; and 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement entered into in this matter. SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 9 Dated: January 16, 2018 By: _ HON. CHRISTINA A. SNYDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?