Brandon Ruiz v. K. Robinson et al

Filing 15

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendat ion of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Plaintiff's objections to the Report ("Objections"). The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Complaint is DISMISSED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. 10 (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION) (gr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

BRANDON RUIZ,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
K. ROBINSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
_________________________________ )

NO. CV 17-6112-FMO (KS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all
of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
(“Report”), and Plaintiff’s objections to the Report (“Objections”).. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those
portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. The Court concludes that the
arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set
forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Complaint is DISMISSED;
and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

25
26
27
28

DATED:

January 10, 2018

__________________/s/_________________
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE