Chanel, Inc. v. Kelly Stephens

Filing 21

JUDGMENT by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff Chanel, Inc. and against defendant Kelly Stephens on plaintiff's claims. Plaintiff shall recover against defendant Kelly Stephens in the amount of $26,615, consisting of $24,000 in statutory trademark damages, $2,040 in attorney's fees, and $575.00 in costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHANEL, INC., 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 KELLY STEPHENS, 14 Defendant. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 17-6150 FMO (ASx) JUDGMENT 16 17 18 Pursuant to the Court’s Order Re: Default Judgment, filed contemporaneously with the filing of this Judgment, IT IS ADJUDGED that: 19 20 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiff Chanel, Inc. and against defendant Kelly Stephens on plaintiff’s claims. 21 2. Plaintiff shall recover against defendant Kelly Stephens in the amount of $26,615, 22 consisting of $24,000 in statutory trademark damages, $2,040 in attorney’s fees, and $575.00 in 23 costs. 24 3. Defendant Kelly Stephens d/b/a 6013038381@craigslist.org , her successors and 25 assigns, agents, officers, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons or entities in 26 active concert or participation with her who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal 27 service or otherwise, are enjoined and permanently restrained from directly or indirectly: 28 1 a. manufacturing or causing to be manufactured, importing, advertising, or 2 promoting, distributing, selling or offering to sell counterfeit and infringing goods 3 using Chanel, Inc’s trademarks CHANEL (Reg. No. 0,626,035), (Reg. No. 4 1,314,511), CHANEL (Reg. No. 1,347, 677), and (Reg. No. 1,734,822) (collectively, 5 “Chanel Marks”); 6 b. using the Chanel Marks in connection with the sale of any unauthorized goods; 7 c. using any logo, image and/or layout which may be calculated to falsely advertise 8 the services or products of defendant, or offered for sale via the defendant’s online 9 business via craigslist.org under the identification 6013038381@craigslist.org and/or 10 any other website, social media platform, or business, as being sponsored by, 11 authorized by, endorsed by, or in any way associated with Chanel, Inc.; 12 d. 13 sponsorship or association; 14 e. engaging in any act which is likely to cause members of the trade and/or 15 purchasing public to believe any goods or services of defendant sold by or offered 16 for sale by defendant are in any way endorsed, approved by, and/or associated with 17 Chanel, Inc.; 18 f. using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of the Chanel 19 Marks in connection with the publicity, promotion, sale, or advertising of any goods 20 sold 21 6013038381@craigslist.org and/or any other website, social media platform, or 22 business, including without limitation, handbags and wallets; 23 g. affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the sale of any goods, a 24 false description or representation, including words or other symbols tending to 25 falsely describe or represent goods offered for sale or sold by defendant via 26 craigslist.org under the identification 6013038381@craigslist.org and/or any other 27 website, social media platform, or business, as being those of Chanel, Inc. or in any 28 way endorsed by plaintiff. falsely representing itself as being connected with Chanel, Inc., through by defendant via craigslist.org 2 under the identification 1 4. Plaintiff shall serve defendant Kelly Stephens with a copy of this Judgment in such 2 a manner as to make it operative in any future proceedings. 3 Dated this 30th day of January, 2018. 4 5 /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?