Thomas Mason LaBarge v. Nancy B. Berryhill
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani.Accordingly, no later than October 13, 2017, Plaintiff is ordered to show causewhy this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Filing the proofs of service by October 13, 2017, shall be deemed compliant with this Order to Show Cause. (dc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES—
GENERAL
Case No.
CV 17-06169-PSG (SHK)
Date: September 29, 2017
Title: Thomas Mason LaBarge v. Nancy B. Berryhill
Present: The Honorable SHASHI H. KEWALRAMANI, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. CASTELLANOS
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
None Present
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Present
Proceedings (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On August 19, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of a
decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Electronic Case Filing Number
(“ECF No.”) 1. On August 29, 2017 the Court issued its Case Management Order in
which, plaintiff was ordered to file proofs of service within thirty (30) days after the
filing of the complaint. ECF No. 9 at 1-2. The order warned plaintiff that failure to
comply may result in dismissal of the case. Id. at 2. To date, the proofs of service
have not been filed with the Court.
Accordingly, no later than October 13, 2017, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause
why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Filing the proofs of
service by October 13, 2017, shall be deemed compliant with this Order to Show
Cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Page 1
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk _DC_
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?