Paul Benavidez v. Kmart Corporation et al

Filing 58

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR VIOLATION OF COURT ORDER: On November 1, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiff Paul Benavidez (Plaintiff) to file, on or before November 6, 2018, a dismissal of this action as to Defendant K MART Corporation or a Notice indicating that Plaintiff intends to pursue this action against KMART Corporation in this Court. As of November 12, 2018, Plaintiff has failed to file any document in response to the Courts Order. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, on or before November 21, 2018, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs violation of the Courts Order. No oral argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the dismissal of this action. (sr)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES -- GENERAL
Case No.

CV 17-6226-JFW (JEMx)

Title:

Paul Benavidez -v- KMART Corporation, et al.

Date: November 13, 2018

PRESENT:
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Shannon Reilly
Courtroom Deputy

None Present
Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
None
PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS):

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
None

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR VIOLATION OF
COURT ORDER

On November 1, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiff Paul Benavidez (“Plaintiff”) to file, on or
before November 6, 2018, a dismissal of this action as to Defendant KMART Corporation or a
Notice indicating that Plaintiff intends to pursue this action against KMART Corporation in this
Court. As of November 12, 2018, Plaintiff has failed to file any document in response to the
Court’s Order.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing, on or before November 21, 2018,
why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s violation of the Court’s Order. No oral
argument on this matter will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
78; Local Rule 7-15. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of the response
to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause will result in the
dismissal of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1 of 1

Initials of Deputy Clerk sr