Romaine L. Nevels v. Debbie Ascunion et al
Filing
28
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 by Judge James V. Selna. Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND against Defendant Ascunion; and (2) Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint will proceed against Defendants Avalos, Barbatos, and Im. (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
ROMAINE L. NEVELS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
DEBBIE ASCUNION, et. al.,
15
Defendants.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. CV 17-6434-JVS (AS)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Third
20
Amended Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and
21
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections
22
were filed.
Accordingly, the Court concurs with and accepts the
23
findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge in the Report and
24
Recommendation.
25
26
27
28
1
IT IS ORDERED that:
2
(1)
Plaintiff’s
Third
3
PREJUDICE
4
6
(2)
Plaintiff’s
WITHOUT
Complaint
Third
LEAVE
Amended
TO
is
AMEND
DISMISSED
Complaint
against
WITH
Ascunion; and
5
and
Amended
will
Defendant
proceed against
Defendants Avalos, Barbatos, and Im.
7
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order on
9 Plaintiff at his current address of record.
10
11
12
DATED: August 16, 2018
13
14
15
16
JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?