Edward J. Ortega v. County of Los Angeles, et al

Filing 203

JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT by Clerk: This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Edward J. Ortega take nothing against Defendant Ronald Valdivia and that the action be dismissed on the merits. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER EDWARD J. ORTEGA, CV 17-6576-DMG (PLAx) PLAINTIFF v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT DEFENDANTS. This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiff Edward J. Ortega take nothing against Defendant Ronald Valdivia and that the action be dismissed on the merits.1 Clerk, U. S. District Court Dated: August 8, 2019 By /s/ Kane Tien, Deputy Clerk 1 The Court was informed on the first day of trial, July 30, 2019, that Plaintiff and Defendant Jag Pathirana had entered into a settlement. Subsequently, on August 2, 2019, Plaintiff and Defendant Keith Kauffman also entered into a settlement. CV-44 (11/96) JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANT(S)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?