Elaine Kosogon v. Neiman Marcus
Filing
13
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the Voluntary Dismissal 12 should be GRANTED. Defendant Neiman Marcus is hereby dismissed with prejudice with the parties to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
JS-6
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case No.: 2:17-cv-06730-MWF-RAO
ELAINE KOSOGON,
ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
vs.
NEIMAN MARCUS,
Defendant(s).
13
14
15
16
17
18
The court has considered the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of
Defendant Neiman Marcus filed by Plaintiff.
The court finds that the Voluntary Dismissal should be GRANTED. Defendant
Neiman Marcus is hereby dismissed with prejudice with the parties to bear their own costs
19
20
and attorney’s fees.
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: November 14, 2017
___________________________
Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald
United States District Judge
26
27
28
ORDER OF STIPULATION TO DISMISS
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?