Elaine Kosogon v. Neiman Marcus

Filing 13

ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that the Voluntary Dismissal 12 should be GRANTED. Defendant Neiman Marcus is hereby dismissed with prejudice with the parties to bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 10 11 12 Case No.: 2:17-cv-06730-MWF-RAO ELAINE KOSOGON, ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, vs. NEIMAN MARCUS, Defendant(s). 13 14 15 16 17 18 The court has considered the Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Neiman Marcus filed by Plaintiff. The court finds that the Voluntary Dismissal should be GRANTED. Defendant Neiman Marcus is hereby dismissed with prejudice with the parties to bear their own costs 19 20 and attorney’s fees. 21 22 23 24 25 Dated: November 14, 2017 ___________________________ Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald United States District Judge 26 27 28 ORDER OF STIPULATION TO DISMISS -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?