Lacy Atzin et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al

Filing 121

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : The Court GRANTS final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 of the settlement of the individual claims of Plaintiffs Lacy Atzin and Mark Andersen and the class claims of the Knee Subclass and the Foot/Ankle Subclass as against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Service, Inc. 13 , and accordingly DISMISSES this entire action and all individual and class claims therein on the merits and with prejudice. This order constitutes the FINAL JUDGMENT of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 LACY AZTIN and MARK ANDERSEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 v. Case № 2:17-cv-06816-ODW (PLAx) JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ANTHEM, INC. et al., 16 Defendants. 17 The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUGES, and DECREES as follows: 18 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The Court GRANTS final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 2 Procedure 23 of the settlement of the individual claims of Plaintiffs Lacy Atzin and 3 Mark Andersen and the class claims of the Knee Subclass and the Foot/Ankle 4 Subclass as against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Service, Inc., and 5 accordingly DISMISSES this entire action and all individual and class claims therein 6 on the merits and with prejudice. This order constitutes the FINAL JUDGMENT 7 of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close the case. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. October 25, 2022 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?