Lacy Atzin et al v. Anthem, Inc. et al
Filing
121
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II : The Court GRANTS final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 of the settlement of the individual claims of Plaintiffs Lacy Atzin and Mark Andersen and the class claims of the Knee Subclass and the Foot/Ankle Subclass as against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Service, Inc. 13 , and accordingly DISMISSES this entire action and all individual and class claims therein on the merits and with prejudice. This order constitutes the FINAL JUDGMENT of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Central District of California
9
10
11
12
LACY AZTIN and MARK ANDERSEN,
on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
v.
Case № 2:17-cv-06816-ODW (PLAx)
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT
ANTHEM, INC. et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUGES, and DECREES as follows:
18
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The Court GRANTS final approval pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
2
Procedure 23 of the settlement of the individual claims of Plaintiffs Lacy Atzin and
3
Mark Andersen and the class claims of the Knee Subclass and the Foot/Ankle
4
Subclass as against Defendants Anthem, Inc. and Anthem UM Service, Inc., and
5
accordingly DISMISSES this entire action and all individual and class claims therein
6
on the merits and with prejudice. This order constitutes the FINAL JUDGMENT
7
of the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment and close the case.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 25, 2022
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?