Erica Hernandez v. Starbucks Coffee Company, et al

Filing 109

AMENDED JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. PROC. 58) by Judge Dale S. Fischer. (SEE AMENDED JUDGMENT FOR SPECIFICS). (jp)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

Case No. 2:17−cv−6927 DSF (GJSx)

ERICA HERNANDEZ,

13
14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
vs.
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY,
et. al.
Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

AMENDED JUDGMENT

AMENDED JUDGMENT (FED. R.
CIV. PROC. 58)

1

The above-entitled action having been tried before the Court sitting with a

2 jury, the Honorable Dale S Fischer, District Judge, presiding; the issues having been
3 duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Erica Hernandez
take nothing; that the action be dismissed on the merits; and the defendant
Starbucks Corporation, erroneously sued as Starbucks Coffee Company recover of
the Plaintiff Erica Hernandez its costs of action, taxed in the sum of $12,971.79.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: September 26, 2019

11

Honorable Dale S. Fischer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

AMENDED JUDGMENT

2