Ryan Kieslich v. California Cinema Investments LLC et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation and Request for Entry of Order Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint to Withdraw Plaintiff's FLSA Claim (Claim1) and Remand the Action 20 by Judge John F. Walter that (1) The Joint Stipulation to Amend Plaintif f's First Amended Complaint so as to withdraw Plaintiff's first claim for relief under the FLSA pursuant to Federal Rule 15(a) is GRANTED; (2) Claim 1 of Plaintiff First Amended Complaint is deemed WITHDRAWN without prejudice to the right o f Plaintiff to assert such a claim at a later date; (3) Plaintiff is granted leaved to amend the FAC by filing the [Proposed] Second amended Complaint, attached at Exhibit A to the parties Joint Stipulation, pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 et seq. (4) In light of the amendment of the Plaintiff's complaint so as to withdraw Plaintiff's sole federal claim, the Court is divested of federal question subject matter jurisdiction, and the Court exercises its discretion to remand the instant actio n to the state court where it originated. The Clerk is therefore directed to REMAND this case to the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, Central District, Central Civil West Courthouse, 600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90005 , LASC Case No. BC664439. (5) Each of the Parties shall bear his/her/its own attorneys fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of the instant action; and (6) After the remand has been effected, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
13 RICHARD E. QUINTILONE II (SBN 200995) REQ@QUINTLAW.COM ALVIN B. LINDSAY (SBN 220236) ABL@QUINTLAW.COM GEORGE A. ALOUPAS (SBN 313112) JS-6 GAA@QUINTLAW.COM QUINTILONE & ASSOCIATES 22974 EL TORO ROAD, SUITE 100 LAKE FOREST, CA 92630 TELEPHONE: (949) 458-9675 FACSIMILE: (949) 458-9679 Attorneys for Plaintiff, RYAN KIESLICH on behalf of himself and on behalf of a Class of all other persons similarly situated ROBERT L. SHIPLEY, CA. STATE BAR NO 109420) RSHIPLEY@SHIPLEYLAW.COM BRANDON S. GRAY, CA State Bar No. 109420 BGRAY@SHIPLEYLAW.COM ROBERT L. SHIPLEY, APLC 2784 GATEWAY RD, SUITE 104 CARLSBAD, CA 92009 TELEPHONE: 760.438.5199 FACSIMILE: 760.438.3706 Attorneys for Defendant CALIFORNIA CINEMA INVESTMENTS, LLC 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 RYAN KIESLICH, on behalf of himself Case No.: 2:17-cv-06985-JFW (JPRx) and on behalf of a Class of all other CLASS ACTION persons similarly situated Assigned For All Purposes To: Plaintiff, Hon. John F. Walter Courtroom 7A, First Street Courthouse vs. ORDER GRANTING JOINT CALIFORNIA CINEMA STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR INVESTMENTS, LLC, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, ENTRY OF ORDER GRANTING LEAVE inclusive, TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT TO WITHDRAW PLAINTIFF’S FLSA Defendants. CLAIM (CLAIM 1) AND REMAND THE ACTION [Filed with Joint Stipulation for Order Entry] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Complaint Filed: June 8, 2017 FAC Filed: August 14, 2017 Removed: September 21, 2017 -1ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S FAC TO WITHDRAW FLSA CLAIM AND FOR REMAND ORDER 1 2 The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation and Request for Entry of Order 3 Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint to Withdraw Plaintiff’s FLSA Claim and 4 Remand the Action (“Joint Stipulation”) submitted by PLAINTIFF RYAN KIESLICH 5 (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated employees of 6 DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA CINEMA INVESTMENTS, LLC (“Defendant”), and 7 Defendant (collectively, “the parties”). 8 The parties stipulated to the amendment of Plaintiff’s First Amended 9 Complaint (Dkt. 1, Exh. “C”, Att. “2”) so as to withdraw the sole federal claim 10 (Claim 1) without prejudice and request an Order remanding the case to state court. 11 The Court approves the relief requested. 12 supplemental jurisdiction over Claims 2 through 11, which seek recovery 13 predicated on state law Labor Code violations. The Court remands this action to 14 state court. The Court declines to exercise 15 Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: 16 1. The Joint Stipulation to Amend Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint so as 17 to withdraw Plaintiff’s first claim for relief under the FLSA pursuant to Federal Rule 18 15(a) is GRANTED; 19 2. Claim 1 of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) is deemed 20 withdrawn without prejudice to the right of Plaintiff to assert such a claim at a later 21 date; 22 3. Plaintiff is granted leave to Amend the FAC by filing the [Proposed] 23 Second Amended Complaint, attached at Exhibit A to the parties’ Joint Stipulation, 24 pursuant to Local Rule 15-1 et seq. 25 4. In light of the amendment of the Plaintiff’s complaint so as to withdraw 26 Plaintiff’s sole federal claim, the Court is divested of federal question subject matter 27 jurisdiction, and the Court exercises its discretion to remand the instant action to the 28 state court where it originated. The Clerk is therefore directed to REMAND this case -2ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S FAC TO WITHDRAW FLSA CLAIM AND FOR REMAND 1 to the Superior Court for Los Angeles County, Central District, Central Civil West 2 Courthouse, 600 South Commonwealth Avenue, Los Angeles, California, 90005, 3 LASC Case No. BC664439. 4 5 5. Each of the Parties shall bear his/her/its own attorneys’ fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of the instant action; and 6 6. After the remand has been effected, the Clerk is directed to CLOSE 7 THIS CASE. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 13 Dated: October 10, 2017 ________________________________ HON. JOHN F. WALTER United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S FAC TO WITHDRAW FLSA CLAIM AND FOR REMAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?