Great Minds v. Office Depot, Inc.

Filing 45

JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. ORDERED, ADJUGED, AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated January 18, 2018, Office Depot's motion to dismiss Great Minds' claim for copyright infringement is granted with prejudice 40 , and as stated in the Court's Order dated February 12, 2018, Great Minds' remaining claim for breach of contract is dismissed without prejudice 43 ; accordingly, the case is closed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 2:17-cv-07435 JFW (Ex)

GREAT MINDS,

vs.
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.,
Defendant.

JUDGMENT
Hon. John F. Walter
Courtroom: 7A – 1st Street
Action Filed: October 11, 2017
Trial Date: October 30, 2018

1

JUDGMENT

2

Plaintiff Great Minds having brought this action against defendant Office

3

Depot, Inc. (“Office Depot”) alleging claims of copyright infringement and breach

4

of contract, and whereas Office Depot having moved to dismiss Great Minds’ claim

5

for copyright infringement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for

6

failure to state a claim, and the matter having come before the Honorable John. F.

7

Walter, United States District Judge, and the Court, on January 18, 2018, having

8

issued its Order granting Office Depot’s motion to dismiss Great Minds’ claim for

9

copyright infringement with prejudice, and the Court, on February 12, 2018, having

10

issued an Order granting Great Minds’ consent motion to dismiss its remaining

11

claim for breach of contract without prejudice, it is,

12

ORDERED, ADJUGED, AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in

13

the Court’s Order dated January 18, 2018, Office Depot’s motion to dismiss Great

14

Minds’ claim for copyright infringement is granted with prejudice, and as stated in

15

the Court’s Order dated February 12, 2018, Great Minds’ remaining claim for

16

breach of contract is dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 20, 2018
HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE