Azariah M. Ellington et al v. Mary Thronton House et al

Filing 191

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 184 , REQUEST for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors 150 , REQUEST for Stay Pending Appeal 154 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2. Plaintiffs' Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors for Order Issued December 10 and Objection to Trial Scheduling (Dkt. 150) is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiffs' Request for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 154) is DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 16 JUDGE MARY THORNTON HOUSE, et al., Defendants. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 17-07587-SVW (JDE) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, 20 including the filings identified in the Report and Recommendation of the 21 assigned United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 184, “R&R”), and the 22 Objection to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiffs (Dkt. 186). 23 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the 24 Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 27 2. Plaintiffs’ Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors 28 for Order Issued December 10 and Objection to Trial Scheduling (Dkt. 150) is DENIED; and 1 2 3 3. Plaintiffs’ Request for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 154) is DENIED. 4 5 May 22, 2019 Dated: __________________ 6 ______________________________ ______________________ _ _ _ STEPHEN V. WILSON V N United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?