Azariah M. Ellington et al v. Mary Thronton House et al
Filing
191
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 184 , REQUEST for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors 150 , REQUEST for Stay Pending Appeal 154 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted; 2. Plaintiffs' Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors for Order Issued December 10 and Objection to Trial Scheduling (Dkt. 150) is DENIED; and 3. Plaintiffs' Request for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 154) is DENIED. (see document for further details) (hr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESTERN DIVISION
11
12
AZARIAH M. ELLINGTON, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
16
JUDGE MARY THORNTON
HOUSE, et al.,
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 17-07587-SVW (JDE)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
18
19
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file,
20
including the filings identified in the Report and Recommendation of the
21
assigned United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 184, “R&R”), and the
22
Objection to the Report and Recommendation filed by Plaintiffs (Dkt. 186).
23
Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the
24
Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made.
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1.
The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;
27
2.
Plaintiffs’ Request for Reconsideration and Correction of Errors
28
for Order Issued December 10 and Objection to Trial Scheduling
(Dkt. 150) is DENIED; and
1
2
3
3.
Plaintiffs’ Request for Stay Pending Appeal (Dkt. 154) is
DENIED.
4
5
May 22, 2019
Dated: __________________
6
______________________________
______________________
_
_
_
STEPHEN V. WILSON
V
N
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?