Carrie Lane v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC611727.Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)

Download PDF
4 Edmond E. Salem, Esq. (State Bar No. 228274) ees@thesalemlawffirm.com Samy M. Harmoush, Esq. (State Bar No. 309966) smh@thesalemlawfirm.com THE SALEM LAW FIRM, APLC 2001 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 305 Tel: (310) 828-7882 Fax: (310) 828-7434 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff, CARRIE LANE 6 11 Eugene Egan (State Bar No. 130108) eje@manningllp.com Anthony Werbin (State Bar No. 285684) aww@manningllp.com MANNING & KASS ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP 801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-3012 Telephone: (213) 624-6900 Facsimile: (213) 624-6999 12 Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 JS-6 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 16 CARRIE LANE, 17 18 19 20 Case No. 2:17-cv-07698-ODW (RAOx) Plaintiff, vs. ORDER GRANTING REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT TARGET CORPORATION, a California corporation; and DOES 1-25, TO STATE COURT inclusive, 21 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [PROPOSED] Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 /// 28 4828-3778-1337.1 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REMAND The Stipulation of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION and Plaintiff 1 2 CARRIE LANE for Remand to the Los Angeles County Superior Court has been 3 fully considered by the Court and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation 4 is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. This matter is hereby remanded to the 5 Los Angeles County Superior Court pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation as Case p p 6 No. BC611727. 7 8 January 8 Dated: _________, 2018 9 _____________________________________ _ _ _ _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DISTRICT T 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4828-3778-1337.1 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REMAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?