Carrie Lane v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO REMAND TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number BC611727.Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)
4
Edmond E. Salem, Esq. (State Bar No. 228274)
ees@thesalemlawffirm.com
Samy M. Harmoush, Esq. (State Bar No. 309966)
smh@thesalemlawfirm.com
THE SALEM LAW FIRM, APLC
2001 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 305
Tel: (310) 828-7882
Fax: (310) 828-7434
5
Attorneys for Plaintiff, CARRIE LANE
6
11
Eugene Egan (State Bar No. 130108)
eje@manningllp.com
Anthony Werbin (State Bar No. 285684)
aww@manningllp.com
MANNING & KASS
ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP
801 S. Figueroa St, 15th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-3012
Telephone: (213) 624-6900
Facsimile: (213) 624-6999
12
Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION
1
2
3
7
8
9
10
JS-6
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
16
CARRIE LANE,
17
18
19
20
Case No. 2:17-cv-07698-ODW (RAOx)
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER GRANTING
REMAND FROM FEDERAL COURT
TARGET CORPORATION, a
California corporation; and DOES 1-25, TO STATE COURT
inclusive,
21
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[PROPOSED]
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
///
28
4828-3778-1337.1
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REMAND
The Stipulation of Defendant TARGET CORPORATION and Plaintiff
1
2
CARRIE LANE for Remand to the Los Angeles County Superior Court has been
3
fully considered by the Court and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Stipulation
4
is GRANTED for the reasons set forth therein. This matter is hereby remanded to the
5
Los Angeles County Superior Court pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation as Case
p
p
6
No. BC611727.
7
8
January 8
Dated: _________, 2018
9
_____________________________________
_
_
_
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT
T
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4828-3778-1337.1
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REMAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?