Gisele Johnson v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Inc et al

Filing 16

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/20/2017.Plaintiffs Complaint, which alleges racial harassment and discrimination u nder 42 U.S.C. Section 1981, does not state the grounds for the Court's subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs Action, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), and, as such, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to show cause, in writing, on or before November 20, 2017, as to why this Action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond as indicated herein will result in the dismissal of this Action. (jre)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GISELE JOHNSON, 2:17-cv-07708-RSWL-SS 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction 13 14 15 16 17 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ) PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, a ) California Corporation; and ) DOES 1 to 10 inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 18 19 20 Plaintiff’s Complaint, which alleges racial 21 harassment and discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 22 does not state the grounds for the Court’s subject 23 matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Action, as 24 required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), and, as such, 25 Plaintiff is 26 HEREBY ORDERED to show cause, in writing, on or 27 before November 20, 2017, as to why this Action should 28 not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject 1 1 matter jurisdiction. Failure to respond as indicated 2 herein will result in the dismissal of this Action. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 DATED: November 6, 2017 s/ RONALD S.W. LEW 6 HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW Senior U.S. District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?