Beverly Guess et al v. Wilshire-HDR I LP et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Percy Anderson, Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss Case, 31 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' federal claim is dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs' remaining state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing on their federal claims and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

1

JS-6

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

BEVERLY GUESS, BRITTANY BELL,
Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem
for J.W., a minor,

13

No. CV 17-7715 PA (ASx)
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiffs,

14
v.
15
16
17

WILSHIRE-HDR I, LP; PK
MANAGEMENT, LLC; L.A.
PROPERTY GROUP, LP; GHC
HOUSING, LLC; and DOES 1-50,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21

In accordance with the Court’s January 30, 2018 Minute Order that dismissed with

22

prejudice the federal claim asserted by plaintiffs Beverly Guess, Brittany Bell, and J.W.

23

(collectively “Plaintiffs”) against defendants Wilshire-HDR I, LP, PK Management, LLC,

24

L.A. Property Group, LP, and GHC Housing, LLC (collectively “Defendants”) and declined

25

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims and

26

dismissed those claims without prejudice,

27

//

28

//

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs’ federal

2

claim is dismissed with prejudice and Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims are dismissed

3

without prejudice.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take

5

nothing on their federal claims and that Defendants shall have their costs of suit.

6

DATED: January 30, 2018

7
8

___________________________________
Percy Anderson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-