Joe Rodriguez v. Shannon Emery et al
Filing
8
ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC section 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAI~ DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOE RODRIGUEZ,
12
Case No. CV 17-7982 MWF (SSx)
Plaintiff,
ORDER SU1~Il~IARILY REMANDING
13 '
v.
IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION
14
SHANNON EMERY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state
18
court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly.
19
20
On
November 1, 2017, Defendant Shannon Emery, having
been
21
sued in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in
22
California state court, filed a Notice Of Removal of that action
23
to this Court and presented an application to proceed in forma ,
~
~
pauperis.
The
Court
has
denied
the
IFP
application
under
25
separate cover because the action was not properly removed.
To
26
prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the
27
Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court.
28
1
Simply stated, this
action
could
not
have
been
originally
2
filed in federal court because the complaint does not competently
3
allege
4
jurisdiction,
5
~ 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Svcs., Inc., 545
6
U.S. 546, 563 (2005).
facts
supporting
and
either
therefore
diversity
removal
is
or
federal-question
improper.
28
U.S.C.
7
8
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED
9
to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 1725
10
Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, for lack of subject matter
11
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send
12
a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the
13
Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
DATED: November 9, 2017
18
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?