Joe Rodriguez v. Shannon Emery et al

Filing 8

ORDER SUMMARILY REMANDING IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald that (1) this matter be REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 1725 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC section 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. (Made JS-6 Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAI~ DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOE RODRIGUEZ, 12 Case No. CV 17-7982 MWF (SSx) Plaintiff, ORDER SU1~Il~IARILY REMANDING 13 ' v. IMPROPERLY-REMOVED ACTION 14 SHANNON EMERY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 The Court will remand this unlawful detainer action to state 18 court summarily because Defendant removed it improperly. 19 20 On November 1, 2017, Defendant Shannon Emery, having been 21 sued in what appears to be a routine unlawful detainer action in 22 California state court, filed a Notice Of Removal of that action 23 to this Court and presented an application to proceed in forma , ~ ~ pauperis. The Court has denied the IFP application under 25 separate cover because the action was not properly removed. To 26 prevent the action from remaining in jurisdictional limbo, the 27 Court issues this Order to remand the action to state court. 28 1 Simply stated, this action could not have been originally 2 filed in federal court because the complaint does not competently 3 allege 4 jurisdiction, 5 ~ 1441(a); see Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Svcs., Inc., 545 6 U.S. 546, 563 (2005). facts supporting and either therefore diversity removal is or federal-question improper. 28 U.S.C. 7 8 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that (1) this matter be REMANDED 9 to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, 1725 10 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90401, for lack of subject matter 11 jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1447(c); (2) the Clerk send 12 a certified copy of this Order to the state court; and (3) the 13 Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 DATED: November 9, 2017 18 MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?