Hanin Federal Credit Union v. CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc.

Filing 16

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (see order for details) 15 (klg)

Download PDF
` 1 2 3 4 5 Murray M. Sinclair (SBN 150389) murray@murraysinclairlaw.com MURRAY M. SINCLAIR & ASSOCIATES 1880 Century Park East, Suite 615 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310) 826-2700 Facsimile: (310) 826-2727 Attorneys for Plaintiff Hanin Federal Credit Union 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANIN FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a Federally chartered credit union, 12 13 Plaintiffs, vs. 14 15 Case No. 2:17-cv-08103-DSF-JC MODIFIED ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER RE: MATERIAL PRODUCED IN DISCOVERY CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., an Iowa corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 Judge: Honorable Dale S. Fischer 18 Complaint filed: 10/03/17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER ` ORDER 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Hanin Federal Credit Union and Defendant CUMIS 3 Insurance Society, Inc., through their respective counsel of record, have entered into a 4 Stipulation for Protective Order Regarding Material Produced in Discovery 5 (“Stipulation for Protective Order”), and 6 7 WHEREAS, the Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation for Protective Order, and good cause appearing therefor, 8 IT IS SO ORDERED with the following modification: The timing of the filing 9 of any motion contemplated by Paragraph 9 – i.e., a motion seeking a determination as 10 to whether material was or was not properly designated – shall comport with any 11 Scheduling Order issued by the assigned United States District Judge. Further, any 12 such motion shall comport with Local Rules 37-1, et seq. 13 14 DATED: January 31, 2018 ____________/s/________________ JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?