Selena Leann Smith v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Filing
18
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 17 . The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Cyrus Safa
Attorney at Law: 282971
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562) 868-5886
Fax: (562) 868-5491
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Selena Leann Smith
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
10
11
SELENA LEANN SMITH,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting
Commissioner of Social,
Defendant.
17
18
) Case No.: 2:17-cv-08135-AGR
)
) ORDER OF DISMISSAL
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
The above captioned matter is dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear
its own fees, costs, and expenses.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATE: June 15, 2018
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE ALICIA G. ROSENBERG
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
-1-
1
2
3
4
DATE: June 15, 2018
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICES OF LAWRENCE D. ROHLFING
/s/ Cyrus Safa
BY: __________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorney for plaintiff Selena Leann Smith
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
1
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
FOR CASE NUMBER 2:17-CV-08135-JVS-AGR
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Court for this court by using the CM/ECF system on June 15, 2018.
I certify that all participants in the case are registered CM/ECF users and
that service will be accomplished by the CM/ECF system.
/s/ Cyrus Safa
_______________________________
Cyrus Safa
Attorneys for Plaintiff
___________
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?