Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Bureau of Land Management, et al

Filing 79

JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Food Safety against Cadiz, Inc., U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt. Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Fo od Safety and against Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al. and Defendant-Intervenors Cadiz, Inc. et al. in accordance with the Courts June 20, 2019 final ruling on the parties cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF No. 75. Defendants October 13, 2017 determination regarding the Cadiz pipeline is hereby set aside and remanded to Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)

Download PDF
J S -6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 GREGORY C. LOARIE (CA Bar No. 215859) MARIE E. LOGAN (CA Bar No. 308228) EARTHJUSTICE 50 California Street, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94111 T: (415) 217-2000 • F: (415) 217-2040 E: gloarie@earthjustice.org • mlogan@earthjustice.org LISA T. BELENKY (CA Bar No. 203225) ARUNA M. PRABHALA (CA Bar No. 278865) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 1212 Broadway Street, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 T: (510) 844-7100 • F: (510) 844-7150 E: lbelenky@biologicaldiversity.org • aprabhala@biologicaldiversity.org 10 ADAM F. KEATS (CA Bar No. 191157) 11 CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY 303 Sacramento Street, Floor 2 12 San Francisco, CA 94111 T: (415) 826-2770 • F: (415) 826-0507 13 E: akeats@centerforfoodsafety.org 14 Counsel for Plaintiffs 15 16 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 17 18 CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY 19 and CENTER FOR FOOD SAFETY, Plaintiffs, 20 21 vs. 22 U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MGMT., et al., 23 Defendants, 24 25 26 27 and CADIZ, INC., et al., Defendant-Intervenors. ) Case No. CV 17-8587-GW-ASx ) ) (Consolidated with Case No. ) 2:18-cv-06775-GW-AS) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 28 1 [Proposed] Judgment – Case No. 2:17-cv-08587 JUDGMENT 1 2 Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Center for Biological 3 Diversity and Center for Food Safety and against Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land 4 Management et al. and Defendant-Intervenors Cadiz, Inc. et al. in accordance with the 5 Court’s June 20, 2019 final ruling on the parties’ cross-motions for summary 6 judgment. ECF No. 75. Defendants’ October 13, 2017 determination regarding the 7 Cadiz pipeline is hereby set aside and remanded to Defendants. See 5 U.S.C. § 706. 8 The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. 9 10 11 Dated: June 30, 2019 12 HON. GEORGE H. WU U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Judgment – Case No. 2:17-cv-08587

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?