Felix Silva v. D. Asuncion
Filing
22
[NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED DATED ON 12/16/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 23 ] - ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank that the Petition is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly. (jp). Modified on 12/16/2020 (jp).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FELIX SILVA,
12
13
14
15
16
Petitioner,
v.
D. ASUNCION,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:17-cv-08637-VBF-JC
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Respondent.
17 ________________________________
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of
19
Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) and all of the records
20
herein, including the June 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States
21
Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections to
22
the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de
23
novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
24
objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions,
25
and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the
26
Objections.
27
///
28
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is
2 dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and
4 the Judgment herein on petitioner and on respondent’s counsel.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7 DATED: December 14, 2020
/s/ Valerie Baker Fairbank
8
________________________________________
9
HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?