Felix Silva v. D. Asuncion

Filing 22

[NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR ISSUED DATED ON 12/16/2020, SEE DOCKET ENTRY NO. 23 ] - ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank that the Petition is denied, this action is dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly. (jp). Modified on 12/16/2020 (jp).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FELIX SILVA, 12 13 14 15 16 Petitioner, v. D. ASUNCION, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:17-cv-08637-VBF-JC ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 17 ________________________________ 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 19 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (“Petition”) and all of the records 20 herein, including the June 18, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections to 22 the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de 23 novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which 24 objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, 25 and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the 26 Objections. 27 /// 28 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied, this action is 2 dismissed with prejudice and Judgment be entered accordingly. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and 4 the Judgment herein on petitioner and on respondent’s counsel. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: December 14, 2020 /s/ Valerie Baker Fairbank 8 ________________________________________ 9 HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?