Edge Systems LLC et al v. Image MicroDerm Inc.
Filing
81
FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT OF WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: IT IS SO ORDERED AND DECREED, AND FINAL JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED (see document for further details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (bm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Paul Stewart (SBN 153,467)
paul.Stewart@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai (SBN 246,922)
ali.razai@knobbe.com
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: (949) 760-0404
Facsimile: (949) 760-9502
E-FILED 5/23/19
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiffs EDGE SYSTEMS LLC and
AXIA MEDSCIENCES, LLC
Marc E. Hankin (SBN 170,505)
marc@hankinpatentlaw.com
Anooj Patel (SBN 300.297)
anooj@hankinpatentlaw.com
HANKIN PATENT LAW, APC
12400 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1265
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone: (310) 979-3600
Facsimile: (310) 979-3603
Attorneys for Defendant IMAGE MICRODERM, INC.
13
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
WESTERN DIVISION
17
18
19
EDGE SYSTEMS LLC, a California
limited liability company, and AXIA
MEDSCIENCES, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company,
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiffs,
v.
IMAGE MICRODERM, INC., a Nevada
corporation,
Defendant.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
AND COUNTERCLAIMS-IN-REPLY
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No.
2:17-CV-08699-PSG-AGR
[PROPOSED]
FINAL CONSENT JUDGMENT
OF WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT
AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION
1
Plaintiffs Edge Systems LLC (“Edge”) and Axia Medsciences, LLC
2
(collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Image Microderm, Inc. (“Defendant”)
3
hereby stipulate and jointly move for entry of final judgment as follows:
1.
4
5
That this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action as well
as personal jurisdiction over Plaintiffs and Defendant.
6
2.
That venue is proper in this judicial district.
7
3.
That Edge owns each of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,641,591 (“the 591
8
Patent”), 7,789,886 (“the ’886 Patent”), 8,066,716 (“the ’716 Patent”), 8,337,513
9
(“the ’513 Patent”), 9,468,464 (“the ’464 Patent”), 9,775,646 (“the ’646 Patent”)
10
and 9,550,052 (“the ’052 Patent”) (collectively, the “patents-in-suit”).
4.
11
That each of the patents-in-suit is valid and enforceable, and that
12
Defendant shall not challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents-
13
in-suit in any judicial, administrative, or other proceeding.
5.
14
That Defendant has manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale,
15
and/or imported into the United States the BioXFusion MD product shown in
16
Exhibit A.
17
6.
That Defendant has manufactured, used, sold, offered for sale,
18
and/or imported into the United States the BioXFusion Mini product shown in
19
Exhibit B.
20
7.
That the manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation
21
into the United States of the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A
22
infringes each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent,
23
the ’464 Patent, the ’646 Patent, and the ’052 Patent.
8.
24
That the manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or importation
25
into the United States of the BioXFusion Mini product shown in Exhibit B
26
infringes each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent,
27
the ’464 Patent, and the ’646 Patent.
28
///
-1-
1
9.
That through the manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or
2
importation into the United States of the BioXFusion MD product shown in
3
Exhibit A, Defendant has infringed each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the
4
’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, the ’646 Patent, and the ’052 Patent.
5
10.
That through the manufacture, use, sale, offer for sale, and/or
6
importation into the United States of the BioXFusion Mini product shown in
7
Exhibit B, Defendant has infringed each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the
8
’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the ’646 Patent.
9
11.
That Defendant induced its customers to infringe each of the ’591
10
Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the
11
’646 Patent, by using the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A because
12
Defendant had knowledge of each of these patents-in-suit, Defendant knew that
13
its customers would infringe each of these patents by using the BioXFusion MD
14
product shown in Exhibit A, and Defendant had the specific intent to induce and
15
did induce its customers to infringe each of these patents-in-suit by using the
16
BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A.
17
12.
That Defendant induced distributors to infringe each of the ’591
18
Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the
19
’646 Patent, by selling and/or offering for sale the BioXFusion MD product
20
shown in Exhibit A, because Defendant had knowledge of each of these patents-
21
in-suit, Defendant knew that distributors would infringe each of these patents by
22
selling and/or offering for sale the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A,
23
and Defendant had the specific intent to induce and did induce distributors to
24
infringe each of these patents-in-suit by selling and/or offering for sale the
25
BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A.
26
13.
That Defendant induced its customers to infringe each of the ’591
27
Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the
28
’646 Patent by using the BioXFusion Mini product shown in Exhibit B because
-2-
1
Defendant had knowledge of each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716
2
Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the ’646 Patent, Defendant knew that
3
its customers would infringe each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716
4
Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the ’646 Patent by using the
5
BioXFusion Mini product shown in Exhibit B, and Defendant had the specific
6
intent to induce and did induce its customers to infringe each of the ’591 Patent,
7
the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the ’646
8
Patent by using the BioXFusion Mini product shown in Exhibit B.
9
14.
That Defendant induced distributors to infringe each of the’591
10
Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the
11
’646 Patent by selling and/or offering for sale the BioXFusion Mini product
12
shown in Exhibit B because Defendant had knowledge of each of the patents-in-
13
suit, Defendant knew that distributors would infringe each of the patents by
14
selling and/or offering for sale the BioXFusion Mini product shown in Exhibit B,
15
and Defendant had the specific intent to induce and did induce distributors to
16
infringe each of the’591 Patent, the ’886 Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent,
17
the ’464 Patent by selling and/or offering for sale the BioXFusion Mini product
18
shown in Exhibit B.
19
15.
That Defendant’s infringement of each of the ’591 Patent, the ’886
20
Patent, the ’716 Patent, the ’513 Patent, the ’464 Patent, and the ’646 Patent was
21
willful.
22
16.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
23
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
24
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
25
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
26
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
27
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
28
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of
-3-
1
2
the’591 Patent during the life of the ’591 Patent.
17.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
3
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
4
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
5
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
6
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
7
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
8
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of the
9
’886 Patent during the life of the ’886 Patent.
10
18.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
11
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
12
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
13
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
14
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
15
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
16
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of the
17
’716 Patent during the life of the ’716 Patent.
18
19.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
19
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
20
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
21
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
22
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
23
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
24
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of the
25
’513 Patent during the life of the ’513 Patent.
26
20.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
27
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
28
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
-4-
1
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
2
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
3
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
4
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of the
5
’464 Patent during the life of the ’464 Patent.
6
21.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
7
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
8
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
9
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
10
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
11
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A, the BioXFusion
12
Mini product shown in Exhibit B, or any other goods that are infringements of the
13
’646 Patent during the life of the ’646 Patent.
14
22.
That, pursuant to the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 283, Defendant,
15
together with its officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates
16
thereof, representatives and attorneys, and all other persons acting or attempting
17
to act in concert or participation with them, are permanently enjoined and
18
restrained from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing into the
19
United States, the BioXFusion MD product shown in Exhibit A or any other
20
goods that are infringements of the ’052 Patent during the life of the ’052 Patent.
21
23.
That Defendant is enjoined from inducing others from undertaking
22
any of the actions prohibited by any of Paragraphs 16-22 of this Final Consent
23
Judgment and Permanent Injunction.
24
25
26
24.
That Defendant has breached Paragraph 5 of the Parties’ August
2014 Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit C (“2014 Agreement”).
25.
That the covenant not to sue granted to Defendant by Plaintiffs in
27
Paragraph 5 of the 2014 Agreement is null and void, but that all other provisions
28
of the 2014 Agreement remain in effect.
-5-
1
2
3
4
5
26.
That Final Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against
Defendant on all claims, counterclaims, and defenses in this action.
27.
That Defendant has not paid any compensation for the infringing acts
described herein.
28.
That no other or further relief, monetary or otherwise, be granted to
6
Plaintiffs or Defendant with respect to each other, and that Plaintiffs will not seek
7
any further relief, monetary or otherwise, from Defendant and/or from any of
8
Defendant’s officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and affiliates,
9
representatives and attorneys, and/or any and all other persons and/or entities
10
acting and/or attempting to act in concert and/or participation with them,
11
including but not limited to, any and all of Defendant’s distributors and/or
12
customers, for any acts and/or omissions relating to the allegations of the
13
Complaint in this matter. Plaintiff’s agreement not to seek further relief from
14
Defendant’s distributors and/or customers shall be void against any distributor or
15
customer who files an action for declaratory relief against Plaintiff relating to any
16
of the patents in suit. For the avoidance of doubt, no license or release is hereby
17
created in favor of Defendant’s distributors or customers, who are receiving only
18
a conditional personal immunity from suit.
19
20
21
22
29.
That Defendant affirmatively waives any and all rights to appeal this
Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction.
30.
That this Court retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce
compliance with the Permanent Injunction.
23
31.
24
action.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
That each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees for this
///
-6-
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED
2
Respectfully submitted,
3
KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
4
5
Dated: May 20, 2019
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
EDGE SYSTEMS LLC and
AXIA MEDSCIENCES, LLC
8
9
10
HANKIN PATENT LAW, APC
11
12
Dated: May 20, 2019
13
14
16
18
IT IS SO ORDERED AND DECREED, AND FINAL JUDGMENT IS
HEREBY ENTERED
19
20
5/23/19
Dated:
21
22
By: /Marc E. Hankin/ (with permission)
Marc E. Hankin
marc@hankinpatentlaw.com
Anooj Patel
anooj@hankinpatentlaw.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
IMAGE MICRODERM, INC.
15
17
By: /s/ Paul A. Stewart
Paul A. Stewart
paul.stewart@knobbe.com
Ali S. Razai
ali.razai@knobbe.com
Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez
United States District Judge
30557834
23
24
25
26
27
28
-7-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?