Nicoline Ambe et al v. Air France, SA
Filing
8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause in writing no later than April 3, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to file a timely response to this Order may result in dismissal of the action. (dml)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
Case No.:
Title:
2:17-cv-08719-RAO
Nicoline Ambe et al v. Air France, SA
Present:
Date:
March 20, 2018
The Honorable ROZELLA A. OLIVER, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Donnamarie Luengo
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorneys Present for Defendant(s):
N/A
N/A
Proceedings:
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
This action was filed on December 4, 2017 by Nicoline Ambe and The Estate of the
Decedent Ndiforchu Alfred Tamunang (by administrator Nicoline Ambe) (“Plaintiffs”) against
Air France, SA (“Defendant”). To date, Plaintiffs have not filed a proof of service of the
Summons and Complaint. Defendant has not yet appeared in the action.
The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs to show cause in writing no later than
April 3, 2018 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and for failure to
comply with Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to file a timely response
to this Order may result in dismissal of the action. If Plaintiff does not intend to proceed with this
action, Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss the case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
41(a) by filing form CV-009, which can be found on the Central District of California’s
webpage: www.cacd.uscourts.gov.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (05/15)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
:
dl
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?