Janice Dawson v. Hertz Transporting, Inc. et al

Filing 97

ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 96 . The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims asserted in the Dawson Class Action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)

Download PDF
JS-6 VINCENT CALDERONE (State Bar No. 164672) CALDERONE LAW FIRM 2 2321 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 1265 El Segundo, CA 90245 3 Telephone: (424) 348-8290 vcalderone@calemploymentattorney.com 1 4 BARRERA & ASSOCIATES Patricio T.D. Barrera (SBN 149696) Ashley A. Davenport (SBN 244573) 6 2298 E. Maple Avenue El Segundo, California 90245 7 Telephone: 310.802.1500 Telefax: 310.802.0500 5 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Janice Dawson and Proposed Class 10 11 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 JANICE DAWSON, an individually and ) on behalf of all other similarly situated ) ) employees, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HERTZ TRANSPORTING, INC., a ) Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1 ) through 20, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _________________________________ ) Case No. CV 17-8766-GW-JEMx (Assigned for all Purposes to the Honorable George H. Wu) ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER 1 2 3 The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims asserted in the Dawson Class Action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 8 Dated: June 3, 2021 _________________________________ HON. GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?