Janice Dawson v. Hertz Transporting, Inc. et al
Filing
97
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 96 . The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims asserted in the Dawson Class Action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mrgo)
JS-6
VINCENT CALDERONE (State Bar No. 164672)
CALDERONE LAW FIRM
2 2321 Rosecrans Avenue, Suite 1265
El Segundo, CA 90245
3 Telephone: (424) 348-8290
vcalderone@calemploymentattorney.com
1
4
BARRERA & ASSOCIATES
Patricio T.D. Barrera (SBN 149696)
Ashley A. Davenport (SBN 244573)
6 2298 E. Maple Avenue
El Segundo, California 90245
7 Telephone: 310.802.1500
Telefax:
310.802.0500
5
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Janice Dawson and Proposed Class
10
11
12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
JANICE DAWSON, an individually and )
on behalf of all other similarly situated )
)
employees,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
HERTZ TRANSPORTING, INC., a
)
Delaware Corporation, and DOES 1
)
through 20, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
_________________________________ )
Case No. CV 17-8766-GW-JEMx
(Assigned for all Purposes to the
Honorable George H. Wu)
ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
ORDER
1
2
3
The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims asserted
in the Dawson Class Action, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
Dated: June 3, 2021
_________________________________
HON. GEORGE H. WU,
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?