Steve Neville et al v. Aldridge Construction, Inc. et al

Filing 143

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: 1. Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. 2. With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not infringe claims 1-4, 6-11, 14-19, 22-27, 29, and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 7,914,236 ("the '236 patent"). 3. With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not infringe claims 1-16, 19-22, 25-28, 31-32, 34-37, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 9,284,708 ("the '708 patent"). 4. The Court retains jurisdiction over this cause and over the parties for the purposes of entering all further post-judgment orders that are just and proper. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

1
2
3

JS-6

4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 2:17-cv-08929-AG (AGRx)
STEVE NEVILLE, SUBSTRUCTURE
SUPPORT, INC., and TDP SUPPORT,
FINAL JUDGMENT
INC.,
Plaintiffs,
Hon. Andrew J. Guilford

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
ALDRIDGE CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.,
FOUNDATION CONSTRUCTORS,
INC., FOUNDATION PILE, INC.,
GONSALVES & SANTUCCI, INC.,
HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION
CO., M-PILE SALES, LLC, MAGCO
DRILLING, INC., MATT
CONSTRUCTION CORP., SHORING
ENGINEERS, and STRUCTURAL
SHOTCRETE SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING
AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE
411 WEST 4TH STREET
SANTA ANA, CA 92701-4516

1

FINAL JUDGMENT

2

Having determined defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment (see

3

D.E. 140), and having granted the parties’ Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Remaining

4

Claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court ORDERS AND

5

ADJUDGES as follows:

6

1.

Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs.

7

2.

With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not

8

infringe claims 1-4, 6-11, 14-19, 22-27, 29, and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 7,914,236

9

(“the ‘236 patent”).

10

3.

With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not

11

infringe claims 1-16, 19-22, 25-28, 31-32, 34-37, and 39 of U.S. Patent No.

12

9,284,708 (“the ‘708 patent”).

13
14
15
16

4.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this cause and over the parties for

the purposes of entering all further post-judgment orders that are just and proper.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Anaheim, California, this 10th day
of October 2019.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: October 10, 2019
Honorable Andrew J. Guilford
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE