Joseph Laughlin v. MicroPort Orthopedics Inc. et al

Filing 29

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 27 . (see order for details) (hr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ERIN M. BOSMAN (BAR NO. 204987) EBosman@mofo.com JULIE Y. PARK (BAR NO. 259929) JuliePark@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 12531 High Bluff Drive San Diego, California 92130-2040 Telephone: 858.720.5100 Facsimile: 858.720.5125 Attorneys for Defendant MICROPORT ORTHOPEDICS INC. BRAD SNYDER (BAR NO. 108643) Brad@bradsnyderlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF BRAD SNYDER 20969 Ventura Blvd., Suite 201 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 Telephone: 818-706-0077 Facsimile: 818-706-1177 Attorneys for Plaintiff JOSEPH LAUGHLIN 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 15 16 17 18 19 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSEPH LAUGHLIN, Plaintiff, v. MICROPORT ORTHOPEDICS, INC.; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 20 Case No. 2:17-cv-09005-RGK-RAO STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER1 Magistrate Judge: Honorable Rozella A. Oliver Courtroom: 590 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver’s Procedures. 28 CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc 1 2 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 5 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 7 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 8 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 10 under the applicable legal principles. 11 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 12 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 13 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 14 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 15 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 16 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 17 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 18 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 19 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 20 parties), personal medical records, information otherwise generally unavailable to 21 the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under 22 state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, 23 to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes 24 over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the 25 parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 26 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of 27 trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of 28 justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the 1 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for 2 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it 3 has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause 4 why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 5 6 7 C. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 13.3, below, that this 8 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 9 under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed 10 and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court 11 to file material under seal. 12 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 13 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, 14 good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City 15 and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. 16 Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony 17 Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective 18 orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good cause or 19 compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be 20 made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The 21 parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as CONFIDENTIAL 22 or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY does not—without 23 the submission of competent evidence by declaration, establishing that the material 24 sought to be filed under seal qualifies as confidential, privileged, or otherwise 25 protectable—constitute good cause. 26 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, 27 then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and 28 the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be 2 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed 3 or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party 4 seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts 5 and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence 6 supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by 7 declaration. 8 Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in 9 its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. 10 If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting 11 only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, 12 shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their 13 entirety should include an explanation of why redaction is not feasible. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Action: This pending federal lawsuit, Joseph Laughlin v. MicroPort Orthopedics, Inc., et al., 2:17-cv-09005-RGK-RAO (C.D. Cal.). 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 23 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 24 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 25 ONLY.” 26 27 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 28 3 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 2 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 3 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 4 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 5 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 6 2.7 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: Disclosure or Discovery 7 Material that qualifies for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), 8 and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement, because it is non-public and a 9 Party or Non-Party in good faith believes must be held confidential to protect 10 personal privacy interests or confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially 11 sensitive information, including trade secrets, or otherwise have a compelling need 12 for privacy. 13 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” 14 Information or Items: Disclosure or Discovery Material that is extremely 15 confidential and/or sensitive in nature, disclosure of which to another Party or Non- 16 Party the Producing Party reasonably believes is likely to cause economic harm or 17 competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party, is highly personal non-public 18 information, or will otherwise compromise or jeopardize the Producing Party’s 19 business interests. The parties agree that the following information, if nonpublic, 20 shall be presumed to merit the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 21 EYES ONLY” designation: trade secrets, pricing information, financial data, sales 22 information, sales or marketing forecasts or plans, business plans, sales or 23 marketing strategy, product development information, engineering documents, 24 testing documents, employee information, and other nonpublic information of 25 similar competitive and business sensitivity. 26 2.9 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this 27 Action. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any 28 other outside counsel. 4 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 2 2.10 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 3 2.11 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 4 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 5 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 6 that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 7 2.12 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 8 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 9 support staffs). 10 11 2.13 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 12 2.14 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 13 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 14 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 15 and their employees and subcontractors. 16 2.15 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 17 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 18 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 19 20 2.16 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 21 22 23 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulated Protective Order cover not only 24 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 25 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 26 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 27 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 28 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 5 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 2 Any Protected Material subject to this Order is for use in this Action only, 3 and may not be used in any other litigation or other proceeding. No attorneys or 4 any other persons, other than the attorneys of record for Plaintiff and Defendant in 5 this Action or any other person authorized to receive and/or use Protected Material 6 pursuant to this Order, are entitled to receive and/or use any Protected Material 7 subject to this Order. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant in this Action and any 8 other person authorized to receive and/or use Protected Material pursuant to this 9 Order, are strictly prohibited from sharing any Protected Material subject to this 10 Order with any attorney(s) or other persons who are not a part of this Action. 11 12 4. 13 DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 14 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 15 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 16 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, 17 with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 18 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, 19 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 20 pursuant to applicable law. 21 22 23 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 24 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 25 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 26 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 27 protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written 28 communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, 6 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 2 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 3 Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 4 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 5 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to 6 impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the 7 Designating Party to sanctions. 8 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 9 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 10 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 11 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 12 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 13 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 14 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 15 produced. 16 17 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 18 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 19 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 20 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), or “HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”, to each page that contains 22 protected material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 23 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 24 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 25 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection 26 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 27 which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 28 before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 7 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 deemed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” After the 2 inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the 3 Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for 4 protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the 5 Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL” legend and/or “HIGHLY 6 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” legend to each page that 7 contains Protected Material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 8 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 9 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 10 (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party 11 identifies the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of 12 the deposition all protected testimony. When it is impractical to identify separately 13 each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection and it appears that substantial 14 portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Designating Party may 15 have up to 21 days after receipt of the final transcript to identify the specific 16 portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of 17 protection being asserted. Only those portions of the testimony that are 18 appropriately designated for protection within the 21 days shall be covered by the 19 provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Alternatively, a Designating Party 20 may specify, at the deposition or up to 21 days afterwards, that the entire transcript 21 shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 22 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 23 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary 24 and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place 25 on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the 26 legend “CONFIDENTIAL” or the legend “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 27 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the information 28 8 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the 2 protected portion(s). 3 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate and Re-designation. A Designating 4 Party that inadvertently fails to designate Disclosure or Discovery Material as 5 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 6 ONLY” pursuant to this Order at the time of its production shall be able to correct 7 its designation, with the Receiving Party reserving the right to assert that such re- 8 designation is improper pursuant to the procedures set forth herein regarding 9 challenging designations. Such inadvertent failure shall be corrected by providing 10 to the Receiving Party written notice of the error and substituted copies of the 11 inadvertently unmarked or mis-marked Disclosure or Discovery Materials. Any 12 Receiving Party that receives such inadvertently unmarked or mis-marked 13 Disclosure or Discovery Materials shall, within five (5) days of receipt of the 14 substitute copies, destroy or return to the law firm representing the Designating 15 Party all copies of such mis-designated documents. The Designating Party shall 16 comply with Section 5.2 when re-designating Disclosure or Discovery Material as 17 Protected Material. Following any re-designation of Disclosure or Discovery 18 Material as Protected Material (or re-designation of “CONFIDENTIAL” material as 19 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”) the Party receiving 20 such Protected Material shall take reasonable steps to comply with the re- 21 designation, including, without limitation, retrieving all copies and excerpts of any 22 re-designated Protected Material from persons not entitled to receive it as re- 23 designated. 24 A Receiving Party shall not be in breach of this Stipulated Protective Order 25 for any use of such inadvertently non-designated or inadvertently mis-designated 26 material before the Receiving Party receives notice of the inadvertent failure to 27 designate, unless an objectively reasonable person would have realized that the 28 material should have been appropriately designated with a confidentiality 9 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 designation under this Stipulated Protective Order. Once a Receiving Party has 2 received notice of the inadvertent failure to designate pursuant to this provision, the 3 Receiving Party shall treat such material at the appropriately designated level 4 pursuant to the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, reserving all rights to 5 assert that such re-designation is not proper under the procedures set forth herein 6 regarding challenging designations. 7 8 6. 9 CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 10 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 11 Scheduling Order. 12 13 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. 14 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 15 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 16 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 17 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 18 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall 19 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 20 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 21 challenge. 22 23 24 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 25 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 26 Action only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this Action. Such 27 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 28 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 10 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of Section 14 below (FINAL 2 DISPOSITION). 3 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 4 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 5 authorized under this Order. 6 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 7 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 8 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 9 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 10 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, 11 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 12 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 13 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including In-House 14 Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 15 Action; 16 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 17 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 18 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 19 (d) the court and its personnel; 20 (e) court reporters and their staff; 21 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and 22 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action 23 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 24 A); 25 26 27 28 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; (h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the 11 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; 2 and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they 3 sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless 4 otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of 5 transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected 6 Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to 7 anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and 8 9 10 (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 11 7.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 12 ONLY” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or permitted 13 in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any 14 information or item designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 15 EYES ONLY” only to: 16 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, 17 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 18 necessary to disclose the information for this Action; 19 (b) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 20 whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action, who have signed the 21 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), and as to whom the 22 procedures set forth in Section 7.4 below have been followed; 23 (c) the Court and its personnel; 24 (d) court reporters and their staff; 25 (e) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and 26 Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action 27 and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit 28 A); 12 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 2 (f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; 3 (g) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting 4 personnel, mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement 5 discussions. 6 7.4 Procedures for Approving or Objecting to Disclosure of “HIGHLY 7 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items to 8 Experts. 9 (a) Unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed to in writing by 10 the Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an Expert (as defined in this 11 Order) any information or item that has been designated “HIGHLY 12 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” pursuant to paragraph 7.3(b) 13 first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full 14 name of the Expert and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (2) 15 identifies the Expert’s current employer(s), and (3) identifies any orthopedic 16 implant manufacturer from whom the Expert has received compensation or funding 17 for work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the expert has provided 18 professional services, including in connection with a litigation, at any time during 19 the preceding five years. 20 (b) A Party that makes a request and provides the information 21 specified in the preceding respective paragraphs may disclose the subject Protected 22 Material to the identified Expert unless, within seven days of delivering the request, 23 the Party receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such 24 objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is based. Absent 25 extraordinary circumstances, the Designating Party will not object unless the 26 identified Expert has received compensation or funding from a direct competitor. 27 28 (c) A Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the Designating Party to try to resolve the matter by agreement within 13 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 seven days of the written objection. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking 2 to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion seeking permission from the 3 court to do so. Any such motion must describe the circumstances with specificity, 4 set forth in detail the reasons why the disclosure to the Expert is reasonably 5 necessary, assess the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail, and suggest any 6 additional means that could be used to reduce that risk. In addition, any such 7 motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration describing the parties’ 8 efforts to resolve the matter by agreement (i.e., the extent and the content of the 9 meet and confer discussions) and setting forth the reasons advanced by the 10 Designating Party for its refusal to approve the disclosure. 11 (d) In any such proceeding, the Party opposing disclosure to the 12 Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure 13 would entail (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party’s need 14 to disclose the Protected Material to its Expert. 15 16 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 17 IN OTHER LITIGATION 18 If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 19 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as 20 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS EYES’ 21 ONLY,” that Party must: 22 23 24 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or 25 order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 26 subpoena or order is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order. Such notification 27 shall include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 28 14 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 2 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 3 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 4 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 5 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ 6 EYES ONLY” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or 7 order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The 8 Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that 9 court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be 10 construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey 11 a lawful directive from another court. 12 13 14 15 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced 16 by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 17 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Such information produced 18 by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and 19 relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as 20 prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 21 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery 22 request, to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the 23 Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 24 confidential information, then the Party shall: 25 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the 26 Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a 27 confidentiality agreement with a Non-Party; 28 15 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the 2 Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a 3 reasonably specific description of the information requested; and 4 5 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party, if requested. 6 (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court 7 within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the 8 Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive 9 to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the 10 Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that 11 is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a 12 determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party 13 shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected 14 Material. 15 16 17 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 18 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 19 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 20 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best 21 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 22 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 23 this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment 24 and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Unauthorized or 25 inadvertent disclosure does not change the status of Disclosure or Discovery 26 Material or waive the right to maintain the disclosed document or information as 27 Protected. 28 16 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 11. PRIVILEGED MATERIAL 2 The parties shall log any asserted privileges regarding written discovery as 3 required under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except that no party shall be 4 required to log communications with Counsel (as defined in Section 2.3) or 5 communications about this Action taking place after it was filed. The parties must 6 provide a privilege log within thirty days of a production. 7 8 9 10 12. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL 12.1 The parties agree that the inadvertent or mistaken production or 11 disclosure of documents or other information subject to a claim of the attorney- 12 client privilege, the work product doctrine, or other privilege or immunity, 13 regardless of the reason for or care taken in connection with the inadvertent or 14 mistaken production, shall not be deemed a waiver of a claim of privilege or 15 immunity, either as to the specific information disclosed or as to any other related 16 information. Further, the parties expressly agree that this agreement shall supplant 17 the requirements of Fed. R. Evid. 502(b)(2) and Fed. R. Evid. 502(b)(3). If a 18 Producing Party inadvertently produces, or otherwise discloses to a Receiving 19 Party, information that is subject to such a claim of privilege or immunity, the 20 Producing Party shall promptly upon discovery of such disclosure so advise the 21 Receiving Party in writing and request that the inadvertently disclosed information 22 be returned. The Receiving Party shall immediately cease all review of such 23 inadvertently produced material, immediately segregate such inadvertently 24 produced material, and return all copies of the inadvertently produced material 25 within five business days of receipt of the request. Any notes, summaries, or 26 analyses referring or relating to any inadvertently produced privileged material 27 shall be destroyed. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall preclude the 28 Receiving Party returning the inadvertently produced material from seeking an 17 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 order compelling the production of information previously produced inadvertently 2 on the grounds that the material was improperly designated as privileged. 3 12.2 The production or disclosure of privileged or work-product protected 4 information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or 5 protection from discovery in this action or in any other federal or state proceeding. 6 This provision shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by 7 Fed. R. Evid. 502(d). Notwithstanding, nothing contained herein is intended to or 8 shall serve to limit a party’s right to conduct a review of any document, ESI, or 9 information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness, and/or segregation 10 of privileged and/or protected information before production. 11 12.3 No challenge in this Action to the designation of Protected Material as 12 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES 13 ONLY” or to a claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure shall assert as a 14 ground for the challenge that the materials were initially produced with an incorrect 15 or with no confidentiality designation or initially produced inadvertently. No 16 challenge in this Action to a claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure of any 17 material initially produced inadvertently shall refer to the information contained in 18 the material produced inadvertently, except the information that appears on any 19 applicable privilege log. 20 21 22 23 13. MISCELLANEOUS 13.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 24 13.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 25 Stipulated Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to 26 object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not 27 addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right 28 18 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this 2 Stipulated Protective Order. 3 13.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 4 Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material 5 may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 6 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material 7 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 8 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 9 10 11 14. FINAL DISPOSITION After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in Section 4, within 60 12 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must 13 return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As 14 used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 15 compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 16 Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 17 Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if 18 not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that 19 (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was 20 returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any 21 copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or 22 capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel 23 are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, 24 deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition 25 and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert 26 work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival 27 copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Stipulated 28 Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 19 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 2 3 4 15. VIOLATION Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 5 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 8 9 DATED: September 12, 2018 10 11 /s/ Brad Snyder Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 13 14 DATED: September 12, 2018 15 16 /s/ Erin M. Bosman Attorneys for Defendant 17 18 19 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 DATED: September 14, 2018 22 23 24 HON. ROZELLA A. OLIVER United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 20 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 4 I, _________________________________ [print or type full name], of 5 ___________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury 6 that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that 7 was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California 8 on [date] in the case of Joseph Laughlin v. MicroPort Orthopedics, Inc., et al., 9 2:17-cv-09005-RGK-RAO. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the 10 terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that 11 failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of 12 contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any 13 information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person 14 or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. 15 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 16 the Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 17 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of 18 this action. 19 I hereby appoint _________________________ [print or type full name] of 20 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and 21 telephone number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with 22 this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective 23 Order. 24 Date: 25 City and State where sworn and signed: 26 Printed name: 27 Signature: 28 21 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO 1 2 ATTESTATION Pursuant to C.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), I, Erin Bosman, attest that 3 the other signatory listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concurs in 4 this filing’s content and has authorized the filing. 5 6 Dated: September 12, 2018 By: /s/ Erin M. Bosman Erin M. Bosman 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 C:\Users\CEG4\Desktop\Proposed_Stipulated_Protective_Order.doc CASE NO. 2:17-CV-09005-RGK-RAO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?