Brian Goldberg v. Nayal Yashar et al

Filing 132

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: On 7/6/2020, this Court GRANTED, in its entirety, a motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills 75 . On 8/11/2020, the Court denied Plaintiff 9;s motion for reconsideration. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendant City of Beverly Hills only. Plaintiff Brian Goldberg shall take nothing by way of his fourth amended complaint against Defendant City of Beverly Hills. Said Defendant shall recover from Plaintiff its costs of suit as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASE NO.: 2:17-cv-9226 AB (GJSx) BRIAN GOLDBERG, 12 BEFORE THE HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 NAHAL YASHAR, DANNY YASHAR, FARIBA LAVIAN, CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, and DOES 1 through 100, 15 16 JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Defendants. 17 18 On July 6, 2020, this Court GRANTED, in its entirety, a motion for 19 partial summary judgment filed by Defendant CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS. [Dkt. 20 114] The Court’s order granting partial summary judgment adjudicated all of 21 Plaintiff’s claims against the CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS in this action. On July 22 24, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order 23 granting partial summary judgment in favor of the CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS. 24 [Dkt. 115] On August 11, 2020, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion for 25 reconsideration. [Dkt. 118] While Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants NAHAL 26 YASHAR, DANNY YASHAR, and FARIBA LAVIAN remain, it is appropriate, 27 pursuant to Fed. Rules Civ. Proc. 58, to enter judgment in favor of Defendant 28 CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS in light of the Court’s orders. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?