Marsha Grigsby v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
60
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. plaintiffs against Ivery Walters, Marsha Grigsby Related to: Order on Motion to Dismiss, Motion Hearing, 58 . (mrgo)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
MARSHA GRIGSBY, an individual;
IVERY WALTERS, an individual,
6
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7
Plaintiffs,
10
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
8
9
CASE NO.: CV 17-9249-GW-ASx
[Assigned to the Hon. George H. Wu]
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.;
CLEAR RECON CORP and DOES 110,
11
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2483/02147433-1
1
CASE NO.: CV 17-9249-GW-ASX
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
On August 30, 2018, the Court issued an Order (Dkt. 58) granting the
2 Motion of Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (successor by merger with Wells
3 Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings
4 Bank, FSB) (“Wells Fargo”) to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint.
Accordingly:
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
7
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
5
1.
The Complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice;
8
2.
Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Wells Fargo and against
9 plaintiffs Marsha Grigsby and Ivery Walters on the Third Amended Complaint and
10 all causes of action alleged therein;
11
3.
Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing in this action from defendant
12 Wells Fargo; and
13
4.
As the prevailing party, Wells Fargo shall be entitled to file motions
14 to tax costs and for attorneys’ fees.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17 Dated: September 18, 2018
HON. GEORGE H. WU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR2483/02147433-1
2
CASE NO.: CV 17-9249-GW-ASX
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to
3 this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address
is 301 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1100, Pasadena, California 91101-4158.
4
5
On September 14, 2018, I served the foregoing document entitled:
6
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP
7
8
9
on the interested parties in said case as follows:
10
Served By Means Other Than Via The Court’s CM/ECF System:
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff:
12
Patricia Rodriguez, Esq.
RODRIGUEZ LAW GROUP, INC.
1492 W. Colorado Blvd., Suite 120
Pasadena, CA 91105
13
14
15
Tel: (626) 888-5206
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Fax: (626) 282-0522
prod@attorneyprod.com
[X]
BY OVERNIGHT DELIVERY - GSO DELIVERY SERVICE: I am
readily familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing
correspondence and documents for service by overnight delivery. Under
that same practice it would be deposited with GSO Delivery Service at
Pasadena, California, on that same day, with charges made to our account
with GSO Delivery Service in the ordinary course of business.
23
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
24 America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the
office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was
25 made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California, on September 14, 2018.
26
Jill Ashley
/s/ Jill Ashley
27 (Type or Print Name)
(Signature of Declarant)
28
93000/FR2483/02147433-1
CASE NO.: CV 17-9249-GW-ASX
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?