Jaime Torres et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Filing
26
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver re Stipulation for Protective Order 25 . (see order for details) (hr)
1 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Christian J. Rowley (SBN 187293)
2 crowley@seyfarth.com
Robin E. Devaux (SBN 233444)
3 rdevaux@seyfarth.com
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
4 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 397-2823
5 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549
6 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Jill A. Porcaro (SBN 190412)
7 jporcaro@seyfarth.com
2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500
8 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021
Telephone: (310) 277-7200
9 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219
10 Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
11
RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI, P.C.
12 Matthew Righetti (SBN 121012)
John Glugoski (SBN 191551)
13 456 Montgomery Street, Suite 1400
San Francisco, California 94104
14 Telephone: (415) 983-0900
Facsimile: (415) 397-9005
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
16
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21 JAIME TORRES, ATA ROUHI and
ELIZABETH ROMERO, individual(s) and
22 on behalf of all others similarly situated,
23
24
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
PROTECTIVE ORDER
DISCOVERY MATTER
25 WELLS FARGO BANK, GEORGE
SARKIS, RAUL VASQUEZ and DOES 1
26 through 50 inclusive,
27
Case No. 2:17-cv-09305-DMG-RAOx
Complaint Filed:
10/25/2017
Defendants.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
2
1.
A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS
Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary,
3
or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use
4
for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly,
5
Plaintiffs Jaime Torres, Ata Rouhi, and Elizabeth Romero (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant
6
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (erroneously sued as “Wells Fargo Bank”) (“Defendant”)
7
(collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the
8
following Stipulated Protective Order. The Parties acknowledge that this Order does not
9
confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the
10
protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited
11
information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal
12
principles.
13
B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT
14
This action is likely to involve trade secrets, commercial, financial, and/or
15
proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use
16
for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and
17
proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential
18
business and financial information, information regarding confidential business practices,
19
or other confidential commercial information (including information implicating privacy
20
rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or
21
which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal
22
statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of
23
information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of
24
discovery materials, to adequately protect information the Parties are entitled to keep
25
confidential, to ensure that the Parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such
26
material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end
27
of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
justified in this matter. It is the intent of the Parties that information will not be
2
designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a
3
good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and
4
there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case.
5
C. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL
6
The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this
7
Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under
8
seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the
9
standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file
10
material under seal.
11
There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial
12
proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good
13
cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and County of
14
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d
15
1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576,
16
577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated protective orders require good cause showing), and
17
a specific showing of good cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support
18
and legal justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks
19
to file under seal. The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as
20
CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by
21
declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as
22
confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause.
23
Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then
24
compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief
25
sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos
26
v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of
27
information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal in connection
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling
2
reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing
3
order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal
4
must be provided by declaration.
5
Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable in its
6
entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be redacted. If
7
documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public viewing, omitting only the
8
confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable portions of the document, shall be filed.
9
Any application that seeks to file documents under seal in their entirety should include an
10
explanation of why redaction is not feasible.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
2.
DEFINITIONS
2.1.
Action: This pending federal lawsuit, Torres v. Wells Fargo Bank, Case No.
2:17-cv-09305-DMG-RAOx.
2.2.
Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of
information or items under this Order.
2.3.
“CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it
18
is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under
19
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause
20
Statement.
21
2.4.
Counsel: Counsel of Record for the Parties (including support staff).
22
2.5.
Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or
23
items that it or another Party or Non-Party produces in disclosures or in responses to
24
discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
25
26
2.6.
Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the
medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in
2
disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.
3
2.7.
Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter
4
pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an
5
expert witness or as a consultant in this Action.
6
7
8
9
10
2.8.
House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action.
House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.
2.9.
Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or
other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.
2.10. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to
11
this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have
12
appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has
13
appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff.
14
2.11. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors,
15
employees, consultants, retained experts, and Counsel of Record (and their support
16
staffs).
17
18
19
2.12. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or
Discovery Material in this Action.
2.13. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support
20
services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or
21
demonstrations, and organizing, storing, processing, or retrieving data in any form or
22
medium) and their employees and subcontractors.
23
24
25
26
2.14. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated
as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
2.15. Receiving Party: a Party or Non-Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery
Material from a Producing Party.
27
28
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
3.
2
SCOPE
The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected
3
Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from
4
Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected
5
Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their
6
Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.
7
8
Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial
judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial.
9
10
4.
11
DURATION
Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as
12
CONFIDENTIAL or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as
13
an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of
14
the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual
15
findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See
16
Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1180-81 (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing
17
documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-
18
related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this protective
19
order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial.
20
21
22
5.
DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL
5.1.
Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each
23
Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order
24
must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the
25
appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those
26
parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that
27
28
6
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection
2
is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order.
3
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that
4
are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g.,
5
to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary
6
expenses and burdens on other Parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions.
7
If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it
8
designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must
9
promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation.
10
5.2.
Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in
11
this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of Section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise
12
stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under
13
this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced.
14
Designation in conformity with this Order requires:
15
(a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents in
16
.tiff or image format, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial
17
proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend
18
“CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that contains
19
protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for
20
protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.,
21
by making appropriate markings in the margins). In the case of electronically stored
22
information produced in native format, by including “CONFIDENTIAL” in the file or
23
directory name, or by affixing the CONFIDENTIAL legend or to the media containing
24
the Disclosure or Discovery Material (e.g., CDROM, floppy disk, DVD).
25
A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection need
26
not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which
27
documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the
28
7
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed
2
“CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants
3
copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions
4
thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified
5
documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page
6
that contains Protected Material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for
7
protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g.,
8
by making appropriate markings in the margins).
9
(b) for testimony given in depositions, that the Designating Party identifies the
10
Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the deposition all
11
protected testimony.
12
(c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any
13
other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of
14
the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend
15
“CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information warrants protection,
16
the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
17
5.3.
Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure
18
to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the
19
Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon
20
timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to
21
assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order.
22
23
24
6.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS
6.1.
Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a
25
designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s Scheduling
26
Order.
27
28
8
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
2
6.2.
Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution
process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq.
3
6.3.
The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the
4
Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g.,
5
to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other Parties) may expose the
6
Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn
7
the confidentiality designation, all Parties shall continue to afford the material in question
8
the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until
9
the Court rules on the challenge.
10
11
12
7.
ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
7.1.
Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is
13
disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action
14
only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action; however, this
15
provision is not intended to prevent nor interfere with Plaintiffs’ counsel’s ability to
16
represent individuals who appear on the class list in prosecuting any rights they may have
17
in any other proceedings simply because Defendant may mark the document which
18
constitutes the class list as confidential. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to
19
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the
20
Action has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of
21
Section 13, FINAL DISPOSITION, below.
22
Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a
23
location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons
24
authorized under this Order.
25
7.2.
Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise
26
ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party
27
may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to:
28
9
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as
2
employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to
3
disclose the information for this Action;
4
5
(b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the
Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action;
6
(c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom
7
disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
8
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
9
(d) the court and its personnel;
10
(e) court reporters and their staff;
11
(f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors
12
to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the
13
“Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A);
14
15
(g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a
custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;
16
(h) during their depositions, witnesses, and attorneys for witnesses, in the
17
Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party
18
requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit 1 hereto; and (2) they will not
19
be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment
20
and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating
21
Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to
22
depositions that reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter
23
and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective
24
Order; and
25
26
(i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, mutually
agreed upon by any of the Parties engaged in settlement discussions.
27
28
10
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
8.
PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN
2
OTHER LITIGATION
3
If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that
4
compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as
5
“CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must:
6
7
(a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall
include a copy of the subpoena or court order;
8
(b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to
9
issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or
10
order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy of this
11
Stipulated Protective Order; and
12
13
(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by
the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.
14
If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the
15
subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as
16
“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or
17
order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The
18
Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of
19
its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as
20
authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive
21
from another court.
22
23
24
9.
A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED
IN THIS LITIGATION
25
(a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-
26
Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced
27
by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief
28
11
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting a
2
Non-Party from seeking additional protections.
3
(b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to
4
produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject
5
to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential
6
information, then the Party shall:
7
(1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that
8
some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a
9
Non-Party;
10
(2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective
11
Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific
12
description of the information requested; and
13
14
(3) make the information requested available for inspection by the NonParty, if requested.
15
(c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 14
16
days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may
17
produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If
18
the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any
19
information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement
20
with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the
21
contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this
22
court of its Protected Material.
23
24
25
10.
UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL
If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed
26
Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this
27
Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing
28
12
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures; (b) use its best efforts to retrieve
2
all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material; (c) inform the person or persons to
3
whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order; and (d) request
4
such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound”
5
that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
6
7
11.
INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE
8
PROTECTED MATERIAL
9
When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain produced
10
material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the
11
Receiving Parties include those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B).
12
This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-
13
discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to
14
Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the
15
effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client
16
privilege or work product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the
17
stipulated protective order submitted to the court.
18
19
20
21
22
12.
MISCELLANEOUS
12.1. Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any
person to seek its modification by the Court in the future.
12.2. Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this
23
Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing
24
or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated
25
Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in
26
evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.
27
28
13
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
12.3. Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected
2
Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed
3
under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected
4
Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the
5
court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless
6
otherwise instructed by the court.
7
8
9
13.
FINAL DISPOSITION
After the final disposition of this Action, within 60 days of a written request by the
10
Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the
11
Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected
12
Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format
13
reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is
14
returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the
15
Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60
16
day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material
17
that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained
18
any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or
19
capturing any of the Protected Material.
20
Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of
21
all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda,
22
correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and
23
consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material.
24
Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to
25
this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4, DURATION.
26
27
28
14
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
2
3
14.
VIOLATION
Any violation of this Order may be punished by any and all appropriate measures
including, without limitation, contempt proceedings, and/or monetary sanctions.
4
5
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), I, Robin E. Devaux, certify that all other
6
signatories listed, on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content
7
and have authorized the filing.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
10
11
DATED: June 5, 2018
12
/s/ John Glugoski
RIGHETTI GLUGOSKI P.C.
Matthew Righetti
John Glugoski
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, Jaime Torres,
Ata Rouhi, and Elizabeth Romero
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED: June 5, 2018
/s/ Robin E. Devaux
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Christian Rowley
Robin E. Devaux
Jill Porcaro
Attorneys for Defendant, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 5, 2018
_______________________________________
HONORABLE ROZELLA A. OLIVER
United States Magistrate Judge
15
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
1
EXHIBIT A
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND
3
4
I,___________________, of _____________________, declare under penalty of perjury
5
that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was
6
issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on
7
_______ in the case of Torres v. Wells Fargo Bank, Case No. 2:17-cv-09305-DMG-
8
RAOx. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated
9
Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could
10
expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise
11
that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this
12
Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the
13
provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States
14
District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms
15
of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after
16
termination of this action. I hereby appoint __________________ of
17
_________________________ as my California agent for service of process in
18
connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated
19
Protective Order.
20
Date: ____________________
21
City and State where sworn and signed: ___________________________
22
23
Print Name: ______________________________
24
25
Signature: ________________________________
26
27
28
16
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER / CASE NO. 2:17-CV09305-DMG-RAOX
45606116v.2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?