Felipe Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al

Filing 90

JUDGMENT 86 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Judgment for Defendants on Plaintiffs First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth claims for relief against Plaintiff;2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 FELIPE GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et al., Defendants. Case №. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx) JUDGMENT [86] 1 JUDGMENT 2 In light of the Court’s Orders granting Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, 3 N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, NDeX WEST, LLC, and Rushmore 4 Loan Management Services’s (collectively “Defendants”) motions to dismiss with 5 prejudice (ECF Nos. 64, 68, 82), 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. Judgment for Defendants on Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth claims for relief against Plaintiff; 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 January 9, 2020 16 17 18 19 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?