Felipe Gonzalez v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
90
JUDGMENT 86 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Judgment for Defendants on Plaintiffs First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and Thirteenth claims for relief against Plaintiff;2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs; 3. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
United States District Court
Central District of California
9
10
11
12
FELIPE GONZALEZ,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
v.
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., et
al.,
Defendants.
Case №. 2:17-CV-09310-ODW (ASx)
JUDGMENT [86]
1
JUDGMENT
2
In light of the Court’s Orders granting Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank,
3
N.A., Federal National Mortgage Association, NDeX WEST, LLC, and Rushmore
4
Loan Management Services’s (collectively “Defendants”) motions to dismiss with
5
prejudice (ECF Nos. 64, 68, 82),
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:
1. Judgment for Defendants on Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third, Fourth,
Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Twelfth, and
Thirteenth claims for relief against Plaintiff;
2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs;
3. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
January 9, 2020
16
17
18
19
____________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?