Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew T.E. Coldicutt et al

Filing 6

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SECs Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with I nvestigative Subpoenas should not be issued is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents shall appear on 8/28/2017 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder, to show cause, if there be any, why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative S ubpoenas should not be granted in accordance with the Application filed by the SEC herein. Opposition to the issuance of said Order shall be filed by the Respondents with this Court and served on the SEC's Los Angeles Regional Office by 5:00 PM 8/7/2017. Reply papers in support due by 5:00 PM on 8/14/2017. See document for further details. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

LYNN M. DEAN (Cal. Bar No. 205562)
Email: [e-mail]
ROBERTO A. TERCERO (Cal. Bar No. 143760)
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission
Michele Wein Layne, Regional Director
Alka N. Patel, Associate Regional Director
Amy Jane Longo, Regional Trial Counsel
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Applicant,

14
vs.

15
16
17

ANDREW T.E. COLDICUTT and
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW
COLDICUTT,

Case No. 2:17-mc-00095-CAS(AFMx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY AN ORDER
COMPELLING COMPLIANCE
WITH INVESTIGATIVE
SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE
ISSUED

Respondents.

18
19
20

The Applicant, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), having filed

21

an Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Application for Order Compelling

22

Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas against Respondents Andrew T.E.

23

Coldicutt and the Law Office of Andrew Coldicutt (collectively, “Respondents”), the

24

Court having considered the Application and documents filed in support thereof, and

25

good cause having been shown, the Court being fully advised in the matter, and there

26

being no just cause for delay:

27

///

28

///

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SEC’s Application for an Order to Show

2

Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas should

3

not be issued is GRANTED.

4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on August 28, 2017, at 10:00 a.m, or as soon

5

thereafter as the parties can be heard, the Respondents shall appear before the

6

Honorable Christina A. Snyder, United States District Court, in Courtroom 8D, 8th

7

Floor, located at 350 West First Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, to show

8

cause, if there be any, why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative

9

Subpoenas should not be granted in accordance with the Application filed by the SEC

10

herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any papers in opposition to the issuance of

11
12

said Order shall be filed by the Respondents with this Court and served on the SEC’s

13

Los Angeles Regional Office at 444 S. Flower Street, 9th Floor, Los Angeles,

14

California 90071, such that they arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. (PST), on August 7,

15

2017.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any reply papers in support of the issuance

17

of said Order Compelling Compliance shall be filed by the SEC with this Court and

18

served on the Respondents such that they arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. (PT), on

19

August 14, 2017.

20

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order to Show Cause, and

21

any papers in opposition to the issuance of said Order, or any reply papers, may be

22

accomplished by electronic mail, facsimile, United Parcel Service or personal service.

23
24
25

Dated: July 26, 2017

_
_____
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

26
27
28
1