Securities and Exchange Commission v. Andrew T.E. Coldicutt et al
Filing
6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SECs Application for an Order to Show Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with I nvestigative Subpoenas should not be issued is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondents shall appear on 8/28/2017 10:00 AM before Judge Christina A. Snyder, to show cause, if there be any, why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative S ubpoenas should not be granted in accordance with the Application filed by the SEC herein. Opposition to the issuance of said Order shall be filed by the Respondents with this Court and served on the SEC's Los Angeles Regional Office by 5:00 PM 8/7/2017. Reply papers in support due by 5:00 PM on 8/14/2017. See document for further details. (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
LYNN M. DEAN (Cal. Bar No. 205562)
Email: deanl@sec.gov
ROBERTO A. TERCERO (Cal. Bar No. 143760)
Email: terceror@sec.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Securities and Exchange Commission
Michele Wein Layne, Regional Director
Alka N. Patel, Associate Regional Director
Amy Jane Longo, Regional Trial Counsel
444 S. Flower Street, Suite 900
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: (323) 965-3998
Facsimile: (213) 443-1904
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Applicant,
14
vs.
15
16
17
ANDREW T.E. COLDICUTT and
LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW
COLDICUTT,
Case No. 2:17-mc-00095-CAS(AFMx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY AN ORDER
COMPELLING COMPLIANCE
WITH INVESTIGATIVE
SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE
ISSUED
Respondents.
18
19
20
The Applicant, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), having filed
21
an Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Application for Order Compelling
22
Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas against Respondents Andrew T.E.
23
Coldicutt and the Law Office of Andrew Coldicutt (collectively, “Respondents”), the
24
Court having considered the Application and documents filed in support thereof, and
25
good cause having been shown, the Court being fully advised in the matter, and there
26
being no just cause for delay:
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the SEC’s Application for an Order to Show
2
Cause Why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative Subpoenas should
3
not be issued is GRANTED.
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that on August 28, 2017, at 10:00 a.m, or as soon
5
thereafter as the parties can be heard, the Respondents shall appear before the
6
Honorable Christina A. Snyder, United States District Court, in Courtroom 8D, 8th
7
Floor, located at 350 West First Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, to show
8
cause, if there be any, why an Order Compelling Compliance with Investigative
9
Subpoenas should not be granted in accordance with the Application filed by the SEC
10
herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any papers in opposition to the issuance of
11
12
said Order shall be filed by the Respondents with this Court and served on the SEC’s
13
Los Angeles Regional Office at 444 S. Flower Street, 9th Floor, Los Angeles,
14
California 90071, such that they arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. (PST), on August 7,
15
2017.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any reply papers in support of the issuance
17
of said Order Compelling Compliance shall be filed by the SEC with this Court and
18
served on the Respondents such that they arrive no later than 5:00 p.m. (PT), on
19
August 14, 2017.
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service of this Order to Show Cause, and
21
any papers in opposition to the issuance of said Order, or any reply papers, may be
22
accomplished by electronic mail, facsimile, United Parcel Service or personal service.
23
24
25
Dated: July 26, 2017
_
_____
CHRISTINA A. SNYDER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?