Andrew Mason Dvash-Banks et al v. Rex W. Tillerson et al

Filing 125

JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT JUDGMENT is entered in this matter as follows: Judgment on the 8 U.S.C. 1503(a) claim is hereby entered for Plaintiffs for the reasons stated in the Court's Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)

Download PDF
1 NOTE CHANGES MADE BY COURT 2 JS-6 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 WESTERN DIVISION (LOS ANGELES) 8 ANDREW MASON DVASH9 BANKS AND E.J. D.-B., Plaintiffs, 10 11 v. 12 THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 13 and THE HONORABLE MICHAEL R. POMPEO, 14 Secretary of State, 15 Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-00523-JFW-(JCx) JUDGMENT 17 18 Pursuant to the Court’s February 21, 2019 Order Granting in Part and 19 Denying in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Order 20 Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary 21 Judgment ((“Order”) ECF No. 123), 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED 23 THAT JUDGMENT is entered in this matter as follows: 24 (1) Judgment on the 8 U.S.C. § 1503(a) claim is hereby entered for 25 Plaintiffs for the reasons stated in the Court’s Order. 26 (2) The Court declares that Ethan Jacob Dvash-Banks is a national 27 and citizen of the United States who acquired U.S. citizenship at birth by operation 28 of Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1401(g). [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT 1 (3) The Department of State is ordered to issue to E.J. a United States 2 passport as soon as is practicable but not later than 45 days from the date of entry 3 of this Judgment. 4 (4) If E.J. and Andrew and Elad Dvash-Banks elect to apply in person 5 for a Consular Report of Birth Abroad (“CRBA”) for E.J. at the Toronto Consulate 6 General or any other Consular Office of the State Department outside of the United 7 States, the Department of State is ordered to issue to E.J. a CRBA as soon as 8 practicable but not later than 45 days from the date of the consular interview in 9 connection with that application. 10 (5) The Dvash-Banks family will not be charged any additional fees 11 by the Department of State for obtaining the aforementioned passport or CRBA, 12 having already paid these fees to the Department of State for E.J.’s initial 13 applications, which were improperly denied. 14 (6) Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants with respect to 15 Plaintiffs’ Administrative Procedure Act claim. 16 (7) Plaintiffs’ claim under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth 17 Amended is moot and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 18 (8) If any elements of any of the claims asserted in this action by any 19 party were not the subject of either summary judgment motion, the Court’s Order, 20 or this Judgment, they are similarly moot and are dismissed. 21 (9) The Court retains jurisdiction to adjudicate any applications for 22 attorneys’ fees and costs as allowed by law. Plaintiffs may move this Court 23 separately for attorneys’ fees and costs. 24 25 26 27 It is So Ordered. Date: March 6, 2019 The Honorable John F. Walter United States District Judge 28 -1JUDGMENT 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 By: /s/ Alexa Lawson-Remer Alexa Lawson-Remer (SBN 268855) lawsonr@sullcrom.com SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90067-1725 Telephone: (310) 712-6600 Facsimile: (310) 712-8800 Theodore Edelman (pro hac vice) edelmant@sullcrom.com Jessica Klein (pro hac vice) kleinj@sullcrom.com SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004-2498 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 15 Aaron C. Morris (pro hac vice) amorris@immigrationequality.org IMMIGRATION EQUALITY 40 Exchange Place, Suite 1300 New York, New York, 10005-2744 Telephone: (212) 714-2904 16 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2JUDGMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?