Valadimir Parenago et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., et al

Filing 14

ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE UPON STIPULATION PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 13 , it is hereby Ordered that the entire Complaint, including all causes of action and parties, is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the Stipulation. (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
8
9
10
11
12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
VALADIMIR PARENAGO, an
individual and co-borrower, and
LIUBOV PARENAGO, an individual
and co-borrower,
Plaintiffs,

13
14

vs.

U.S.D.C.# 2:18-cv-00526-AB-AS
Assigned to the Hon. André Birotte, Jr.

[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
THE COMPLAINT WITH
PREJUDICE UPON STIPULATION
PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)

15
16
17

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING,
INC. a business entity, and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,

Complaint filed: October 17, 2017

18
19

Defendants.

20
21

The Court, having reviewed and taken into consideration the Stipulation for

22
23

Dismissal of the Complaint with Prejudice (“Stipulation”) entered into by Plaintiffs

24

VALADIMIR PARENAGO and LIUBOV PARENAGO (“Plaintiffs”) and

25
26
27
28

Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) based on a settlement of the
ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE UPON
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)
1

1
2

above-referenced action, hereby enters the Stipulation as an Order.
It is hereby Ordered that the entire Complaint, including all causes of action

3
4
5

and parties, is dismissed with prejudice in accordance with the Stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8
9

Dated: April 30, 2018

By:__________________________________
Honorable André Birotte Jr.
Judge of the United States District Court
Central District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE UPON
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)
2