Van Aldridge et al v. Technology and Supply Management, LLC et al

Filing 55

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu Related to: Order, Judgment Index - Add Record, 53 . IT IS HEREBYORDERED that:1. A judgment for monetary relief and damages is entered in favor ofPlaintiffs Van Aldridge and German Parra ("Plaintiffs") and against DefendantTechnology and Supply Management, LLC ("TaSM") as follows:a. In favor of Plaintiff Aldridge in the amount of $16,900; andb. In favor of Plaintiff Parra in the amount of $15,600. 2. A judgment of dismissal wit h prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant Scott J. Novak for all claims and allegations in the Second Amended Complaint. 3. As the prevailing parties, Plaintiffs shall have and recover from TaSM attorneys' fees in the sum of one hundred and t wo thousand, nine hundred and thirty-six dollars and zero cents ($102,936.00). 4. As the prevailing party, Plaintiffs shall have and recover from TaSM costs in the amount of one thousand twelve dollars and seventy-five cents ($1,012.75). (mrgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

VAN ALDRIDGE, an individual; and
GERMAIN PARRA, an individual.

Case No. CV 18-1081-GW-AGRx
FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,
v.
TECHNOLOGY AND SUPPLY
MANAGEMENT, LLC a Virginia
Limited Liability Company; SCOTT J.
NOVAK, an individual, and DOES 110.
Defendants.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{01631074;v1 }

1

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

2

Following the Stipulated Judgment entered November 28, 2018 (Dkt. 45), the

3

Bill of Costs entered January 23, 2019 (Dkt. 52), and the Order re Plaintiffs’ Motion

4

for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs entered January 28, 2019 (Dkt. 53), IT IS HEREBY

5

ORDERED that:

6

1.

A judgment for monetary relief and damages is entered in favor of

7

Plaintiffs Van Aldridge and German Parra (“Plaintiffs”) and against Defendant

8

Technology and Supply Management, LLC (“TaSM”) as follows:
a. In favor of Plaintiff Aldridge in the amount of $16,900; and

9

b. In favor of Plaintiff Parra in the amount of $15,600.

10
11
12
13

2.

A judgment of dismissal with prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant

Scott J. Novak for all claims and allegations in the Second Amended Complaint.
3.

As the prevailing parties, Plaintiffs shall have and recover from TaSM

14

attorneys’ fees in the sum of one hundred and two thousand, nine hundred and thirty-

15

six dollars and zero cents ($102,936.00).

16
17
18

4.

As the prevailing party, Plaintiffs shall have and recover from TaSM

costs in the amount of one thousand twelve dollars and seventy-five cents ($1,012.75).
5.

Post-judgment interest in the amount of 2.44% per annum shall continue

19

to accrue on the total amount of the judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1961(a),

20

from the date on which this judgment is entered, until the judgment is paid in full.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26

DATED: February 4, 2019

____________________________
Hon. George H. Wu
United States District Judge

27
28
1