United States of America v. $202,224.00 in Funds From Escrow Account At First Priority Escrow, Inc.

Filing 30

CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Upon Stipulation 29 , IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the United States of America shall have judgment as to $63,500.00 of the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on that amou nt, and no other person or entity shall have any right, title, or interest therein. The government shall dispose of the funds in accordance with law. $138,724.00 of the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on said amount, shall be returned to Claimant Mary Hogan no later than 60 days from the entry of this judgment or Claimant's provision to the government of the bank information and personal identifiers described in this order, whichever is later. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 Case No.: CV 18-1556-DMG (JPRx) CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE [29] $202,224.00 IN FUNDS FROM ESCROW ACCOUNT AT FIRST PRIORITY ESCROW, INC., Defendant. 17 18 19 This action was filed on February 26, 2018. Notice was given and published in 20 accordance with law. Claimant Mary Hogan (“Claimant”) filed a verified claim on 21 April 8, 2018. No other claims were filed, and the time for filing claims has expired. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff and Claimant have reached an agreement that is dispositive of the entire action and have made a stipulated request for entry of this judgment. The Court has reviewed the stipulation and request and, good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1. action. This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter of this 1 2. Notice of this action has been given in accordance with law. All 2 potential claimants to the defendant funds other than Mary Hogan are deemed to have 3 admitted the allegations of the Complaint. The allegations set forth in the Complaint 4 are sufficient to establish a basis for forfeiture. 5 3. The United States of America shall have judgment as to $63,500.00 of 6 the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on that amount, and no other person or 7 entity shall have any right, title, or interest therein. The government shall dispose of 8 the funds in accordance with law. 9 4. $138,724.00 of the defendant funds, plus any interest earned on said 10 amount, shall be returned to Claimant no later than sixty days from the entry of this 11 judgment or Claimant’s provision to the government of the bank information and 12 personal identifiers described below, whichever is later. 13 5. If the United States elects to make the payment by check, the check shall 14 be payable to the “Thomas P. Sleisenger client trust account”, and mailed to Claimant 15 in care of her attorney, Thomas P. Sleisenger, 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 200, 16 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6015. If the United States elects to make the payment by 17 wire transfer, the funds shall be wire transferred to the Thomas P. Sleisenger client 18 trust account. Claimant shall provide the necessary bank account information for the 19 trust account and her personal identifiers upon request from the United States. 20 6. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the seizure of the 21 defendant funds and institution of these proceedings. This judgment shall be 22 construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 23 24 25 26 27 28 7. Each of the parties shall bear its own fees and costs incurred in connection with this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 14, 2019 ________________________________ DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?