Shirley Lindsay v. Overland Partners Sepulveda, LLC et al

Filing 87

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OFDEFENDANT STARBUCKS CORPORATION by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Plaintiff take nothing as to Starbucks, that Plaintiff's claims against Starbucks are dismissed with prejudice, and that Starbucks rec over its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Starbucks may file a noticed motion for attorneys' fees. Related to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment 43 . (lom) Modified on 5/29/2019 (lom).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

SHIRLEY LINDSAY,

Case No. CV 18-1917-GW-PLAx

Plaintiff,

12
v.

13

16

OVERLAND PARTNERS SEPULVEDA,
LLC, a California Limited Liability
Company; STARBUCKS
CORPORATION, a Washington
Corporation; and DOES 1-10,

17

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
DEFENDANT STARBUCKS
CORPORATION

Defendants.

14
15

Complaint Filed: March 8, 2018

18
19
20

The Court having ordered that summary judgment be entered in favor of Defendant
Starbucks Corporation (“Starbucks”),

21

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Plaintiff take nothing as to Starbucks,

22

that Plaintiff’s claims against Starbucks are dismissed with prejudice, and that Starbucks

23

recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with Rule 54 of the

24

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Starbucks may file a noticed motion for attorneys’

25

fees.

26

DATED: _May 28, 2019

27

HON. GEORGE H. WU,
United States District Judge

28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Case No. 2:18-cv-01917-GW-PLA
57066368v.1