Kong v. Margaret M. Harris Corporation et al

Filing 21

(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. In light of plaintiff's showing, defendants, Margaret M. Harris Corporation and Reseda Dental Office of Aram Yeliazyan and Aram Arakelyan, Inc., are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before October 5, 2018, why their answer should not be stricken and a default judgment entered for failure to comply with their discovery obligations. (see order for further details) (hr)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. CV 18-2112 MWF (FFM) Title NEHEMIAH KONG v. MARGARET M. HARRIS CORPORATION, et al. Present: The Honorable Date September 25, 2018 Frederick F. Mumm, United States Magistrate Judge James Munoz None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion for an order compelling initial disclosures, or in the alternative, for an order excluding non-disclosed witnesses and documents, and seeking Rule 37 sanctions, filed September 25, 2018. (Docket No. 20.) Plaintiff asserts that defendants, Margaret M. Harris Corporation and Reseda Dental Office of Aram Yeliazyan and Aram Arakelyan, Inc., have failed to produce their initial disclosures, despite a letter to defendants’ attorney requesting defendants either to comply with their discovery obligations or to meet and confer regarding the missing disclosures. In light of plaintiff’s showing, defendants, Margaret M. Harris Corporation and Reseda Dental Office of Aram Yeliazyan and Aram Arakelyan, Inc., are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, on or before October 5, 2018, why their answer should not be stricken and a default judgment entered for failure to comply with their discovery obligations. Defendants may comply with the terms of this Order by either: 1) filing a proof of service demonstrating that they served plaintiff with a copy of defendants’ initial disclosures; or 2) filing a response detailing defendants’ objections to the entry of an Order striking defendants’ answer and entering a default judgment against defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. : Initials of Preparer CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL JM Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?