Randolph Mora v. J Miller et al

Filing 30

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 28 . In consideration of the parties' stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sbou)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 JONES & MAYER James R. Touchstone, Esq., Bar No. 184584 jrt@jones-mayer.com Carmen Vasquez, SBN 231473 cv@jones-mayer.com 3777 North Harbor Boulevard Fullerton, California 92835 Telephone: (714) 446-1400 Facsimile: (714) 446-1448 jrt@jones-mayer.com JS-6 Attorneys for Defendants: WEST COVINA OFFICER J. MILLER and WEST COVINA SGT. PRIZZI 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RANDOLPH MORA, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. OFFICER J. MILLER, in his individual capacity, SGT PRIZZI, in his individual capacity. Case No: 2:18-cv-02853-JFW-JEM Judge: Hon. John E. McDermott [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION Defendants. 17 18 19 20 ORDER In consideration of the parties’ stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of 21 this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety, 22 with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). 23 24 25 Dated: August 7, 2018 ______________________________ Hon. John McDermott United States District Judge 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?