Randolph Mora v. J Miller et al
Filing
30
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 28 . In consideration of the parties' stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (sbou)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JONES & MAYER
James R. Touchstone, Esq., Bar No. 184584
jrt@jones-mayer.com
Carmen Vasquez, SBN 231473
cv@jones-mayer.com
3777 North Harbor Boulevard
Fullerton, California 92835
Telephone: (714) 446-1400
Facsimile: (714) 446-1448
jrt@jones-mayer.com
JS-6
Attorneys for Defendants:
WEST COVINA OFFICER J. MILLER and
WEST COVINA SGT. PRIZZI
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RANDOLPH MORA,
12
13
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
vs.
OFFICER J. MILLER, in his
individual capacity, SGT PRIZZI, in
his individual capacity.
Case No: 2:18-cv-02853-JFW-JEM
Judge: Hon. John E. McDermott
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
ACTION
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
ORDER
In consideration of the parties’ stipulation for dismissal with prejudice of
21
this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety,
22
with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1).
23
24
25
Dated: August 7, 2018
______________________________
Hon. John McDermott
United States District Judge
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF ACTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?