Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC et al v. Munchkin, Inc.
Filing
394
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Ronald A. Valenzuela (State Bar No. 210025)
rvalenzuela@lathropgage.com
LATHROP GAGE LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1000
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel: (310) 789-4600 Fax: (310) 789-4601
R. Cameron Garrison (admitted pro hac vice)
cgarrison@lathropgage.com
Travis W. McCallon (admitted pro hac vice)
tmccallon@lathropgage.com
Luke M. Meriwether (admitted pro hac vice)
lmeriwether@lathropgage.com
Eric D. Sidler (admitted pro hac vice)
esidler@lathropage.com
LATHROP GAGE LLP
2345 Grand Boulevard, Suite 2200
Kansas City, MO 64108
Tel: (816) 292-2000 Fax: (816) 292-2001
Attorneys for Defendant MUNCHKIN, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
E-FILED 11/4/19
JS-6
EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS,
LLC, and INTERNATIONAL REFILLS
COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:18-cv-03005-PSG-JPR
Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez
[PROPOSED] FINAL
JUDGMENT
vs.
MUNCHKIN, INC.,
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
MUNCHKIN, INC.
Counter-Plaintiff,
2
3
4
5
6
vs.
EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE BRANDS,
LLC and INTERNATIONAL REFILLS
COMPANY, LTD.,
Counter-Defendants.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
1
The Court, having granted Defendant Munchkin, Inc.’s Motion for Summary
2
Judgment as it relates to noninfringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,974,029 and
3
8,899,420 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”), and having denied the remainder
4
of Munchkin’s Motion for Summary Judgment and all other pending dispositive
5
and Daubert motions as moot (see Dkt. No. 392), hereby enters FINAL
6
JUDGMENT of noninfringement in favor of Munchkin and against Plaintiffs
7
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company, Ltd., on
8
all of Plaintiffs’ asserted claims of infringement of the Asserted Patents and
9
Defendant’s counterclaims of noninfringement of the Asserted Patents.
10
It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that Munchkin’s
11
remaining counterclaims for invalidity of the Asserted Patents are hereby dismissed
12
without prejudice.
13
Munchkin reserves its right to seek, within fourteen days after the entry of
14
this Final Judgment, an award of its taxable costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
15
54(d)(1) and C.D. Cal. L.R. 54-2 and 54-3, and an award of its attorney’s fees and
16
nontaxable expenses pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2), and C.D.
17
Cal. L.R. 54-7 and 54-8.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
Dated:
22
11/1/19
PHILLIP S. GUTIERREZ, U.S. District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
31818382v.1
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?