J.C. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 169

JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: On 1/2/2020, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants Nicole Farrell and the County of Los Angeles 111 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of Farrell and the County and against Plaintiffs, and that Plaintiffs take nothing from Farrell and the County. (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 J.C. a Minor, by and through her Guardian ad Litem, Mary Pegler; MARY PEGLER, an Individual; RICHARD COTE, an Individual, 17 18 19 20 21 22 JUDGMENT [167] Plaintiffs, 15 16 Case No: CV 18-3045-DMG (FFMx) v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, by and through THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES; MALIKA EDMONSON, an Individual; NICOLE FARRELL, an Individual; IMELDA SANTOS, an Individual; and DOES 1 through 10, Inclusive, Defendants. 23 Defendants NICOLE FARRELL (“Farrell”) and the COUNTY OF LOS 24 ANGELES (“the County”) filed their respective Motions for Summary Judgment or, in 25 the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, (“Motions”) on November 15, 2019. 26 27 On January 2, 2020, the Court granted summary judgment in favor of Farrell and the County. 28 -1- 1 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered in favor of Farrell 2 and the County and against Plaintiffs, and that Plaintiffs take nothing from Farrell and the 3 County. 4 5 6 DATED: March 25, 2020 DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?