Pascuala Holguin v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 33

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT, TARGET CORPORATION by Judge Manuel L. Real: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the Stipulation for Dismissal 32 , the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

1
2
3
4
5
6

PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP
R. Derek Classen, Esq. (Bar No. 162805)
310 Golden Shore, Fourth Floor
Long Beach, California 90802
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

JS-6

TARG-0447

Attorneys for Defendant, TARGET CORPORATION,
erroneously served and sued herein as TARGET
CORPORATION, a corporate entity

7

UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT

9
ERROR! MAIN DOCUMENT ONLY.LAW OFFICES OF 
PRINDLE, GOETZ, BARNES & REINHOLTZ LLP

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

PASCUALA HOLGUIN, an individual,
Plaintiff,

CASE NO.: 2:18-cv-03136-R (RAOx)
ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION
FOR DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT,
TARGET CORPORATION

v.
TARGET CORPORATION, a corporate
entity; and DOES 1 to 50, Inclusive,
Defendants.

17
18
19

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1), the settlement reached by the parties and the

20

Stipulation for Dismissal, the Court hereby dismisses the complaint, with prejudice.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED
DATED:

October 17, 2018

23
24

___________________________________
U.S. District Judge Manuel L. Real

25
26
27
28
RDC/TARGET/PLEADINGS/HOLGUIN/Stip_Dismissal_Order

1

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANT, TARGET CORPORATION